pkp / pkp-lib

The library used by PKP's applications OJS, OMP and OPS, open source software for scholarly publishing.
https://pkp.sfu.ca
GNU General Public License v3.0
298 stars 443 forks source link

Announcement type is removed without removing related files #10060

Open jonasraoni opened 1 month ago

jonasraoni commented 1 month ago

Describe the bug After the introduction of foreign keys, the assignment type is removed, but the related images are not.

PRs

What application are you using? OJS 3.4

jonasraoni commented 1 month ago

@bozana could you please review this one too? The fixes are on the first 2 commits, the last one is mostly about typing/formatting.

bozana commented 1 month ago

Hi @jonasraoni, here I should wait for you to take a look at nullable that we mentioned in the dev call, or?

jonasraoni commented 1 month ago

Hi! I think you can proceed with the review, most of the updates here are not related to the issue.

Then, I'll create a generic issue to handle the removal of entities that have dependents. The current solution is to block the operation, until the user clears all the dependencies manually... We can offer more options (clear/re-assign the dependencies to another record) to simplify the maintenance.

bozana commented 1 month ago

@jonasraoni, a question before I finish the review: Isn't it so that the announcement title should always exist? -- I see it is nullable in the json schema, but it is a required field in the form. It seems logical to me that the title needs to be there, no? Also the datePosted? The same for announcement type name?

bozana commented 1 month ago

Ah, and why do we delete announcements when deleting an announcement type? Shouldn't the type_id just be set to null? In the Announcement migration we say: $table->foreign('type_id')->references('type_id')->on('announcement_types')->onDelete('set null');

Thus, I would think we shouldn't do anything else when deleting an announcement type?

jonasraoni commented 1 month ago

Hi! I didn't dig so deep, I just applied some fixes/updates, but I agree with everything.

bozana commented 1 month ago

Thanks @jonasraoni, that all sounds good!

jonasraoni commented 1 month ago

@bozana FYI, the nullable is required. That's how it works:

bozana commented 1 month ago

@jonasraoni, let me know when another review round can be done... Thanks!!!

jonasraoni commented 3 weeks ago

@bozana, I think I've addressed all comments, please take a look when you get some free time.

jonasraoni commented 2 weeks ago

@bozana I almost forgot about this PR, I've updated the getDatePosted() to return null, which was the last comment that I saw.

Regarding the nullable, just to confirm, most of the entities would not fail because we have a lot of non-used code. Very few entities are using the Repository::validate($object), most of them are relying on the Form validation.

bozana commented 2 weeks ago

Hi @jonasraoni, please go ahead and merge. Let me know if I need to take a look at something when you port it to other branches -- e.g. if you do more changes for the main branch... Thanks!