Closed alexxxmendonca closed 4 years ago
@alexxxmendonca, I think this is already covered by https://github.com/pkp/pkp-lib/issues/1813, no?
@asmecher possibly yes!
I did not remember of that issue, but perhaps that one is more geared towards journal articles? In general, the behavior is very close to preprints, so perhaps I should just add a comment that preprints should be considered and then link to the ASAPbio report as a reference?
John has made a proposal for how OPS would handle this (with more author control) -- see https://github.com/pkp/pkp-lib/issues/1813#issuecomment-669427522. Yes, please follow up over there with input on OPS. Closing this one in favour of that!
Describe the problem you would like to solve Currently there isn't a formal method of withdrawal and removal of a preprint that has been posted.
The only way of doing it is changing the PDF file with a thumbstone-like file with information of withdrawal. See an example here: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/528
However, the metadata are not updated to include the information that the preprint has been removed or withdrawn and the removal/withdrawal is not reflected on the statistics either.
Describe the solution you'd like ASAPBio has came up with a set of best practices and recommendations for preprint withdrawal and removal at the Defining preprint withdrawal & removal section of this document: https://osf.io/8dn4w/
Who is asking for this feature? It would be important for OPS to follow best practices of preprint withdrawal and removal. Readers, indexing services and the community in general would benefit from this.