search

pkra / laml-wc

A continuation of an experiment
https://pkra.github.io/laml-wc
0 stars 0 forks source link

reconsider name- #1

Closed pkra closed 12 months ago

pkra commented 1 year ago

We use it for sections, theorems and proofs.

It creates headings, so we probably want to limit them to sectioning. Maybe just call it heading- then?

pkra commented 1 year ago

Back in laml days, I liked making theorems sections. Nowawdays I think figure elements are more appropriate. A particular case are proofs but amsmath style guide suggests proof envs are for short proofs, sections for long proofs. Still, we could make a switch to make proofs sections vs figures.

pkra commented 12 months ago

I'll go with restricting name- to sectioning elements. I'll clean those up in general.

I think (for now) my concern about needing a custom element is unwarranted -- ref- usually doesn't need to include the counter.

pkra commented 12 months ago

Was supposed to get closed by a2c87808c9555305a7fa53ceb803b744ef87c175 (typo in commit message prevented auto-close).

However, there are still some name- elements around in proofs and theorems.

pkra commented 12 months ago

I think (for now) my concern about needing a custom element is unwarranted -- ref- usually doesn't need to include the counter.

On second thought, if we want "Theorem 2.1", we'd need to access the counter. Sigh.