Closed IzzySoft closed 7 years ago
So I better keep creating those text files (see #30) for that, also with the next steps (df
) for this, makes that job easier.
So I better keep creating those text files (see #30) for that
Oh yes. And it will be better when you keep package name
with the rules.
And it will be better when you keep
package name
with the rules.
Uh? You mean in those text files? OK, can do that. As I've to process all those entries again anyway, I suggest to update those files along that and then make them available to you again:
da
in almost all of the cases) I'd place the final "target mapping" (i.e. ut
/ui
/df
) – or shall I rather keep the "original mapping" to make clear were it came from? The target becomes clear anyway, because …#
) I'd add the "pn", so it looks e.g. ut;Foo Bar Example;http://example.com/ # com/foobar
Does that match what you were pointing at? No big deal then – your wish shall be my command 😸
instead of the original mapping (da in almost all of the cases) I'd place the final "target mapping" (i.e. ut/ui/df) – or shall I rather keep the "original mapping" to make clear were it came from? The target becomes clear anyway, because …
In my opinion, original mapping is not important. So I suggest place the final "target mapping". What do you think?
after a separator of your choice (easiest would be space-hash-space, i.e. #) I'd add the "pn", so it looks e.g. ut;Foo Bar Example;http://example.com/ # com/foobar
Yes. Keep com/foo/bar
with the rules. It would be useful.
In my opinion, original mapping is not important. So I suggest place the final "target mapping". What do you think?
Too late, I think – I finished that job yesterday :flushed:
Yes. Keep
com/foo/bar
with the rules. It would be useful.
That was done. I've also created a separate issue to collect the open tasks from this round of PRs, so we don't miss one of them. Just waiting for your "go" for them, and then will finish that ASAP.
Too late, I think – I finished that job yesterday 😳
Never mind, it's ok.