Closed kittyl closed 7 years ago
Yes, I think I replaced that in the dexseq pipeline. But perhaps not the deseq steps. I was thinking of reading the deseq vignette to see how they suggest to do it.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:09 AM, kittyl notifications@github.com wrote:
The latest version of DEXSeq no longer has this function. It has been replaced with DEXSeqDataSetFromHTSeq Will need to fix.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/plagnollab/RNASeq_pipeline/issues/3.
Vincent Plagnol University College London Genetics Institute Darwin building, office 210 Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT Cell: +44-(0)7946-546923 Office: +44-(0) 2031-084002 Website: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ugi/research/vincentplagnol Lab blog: http://plagnol-lab.blogspot.co.uk/
Ok. I think it would still be good if we can keep the counts_prepare part separate from the deseq and dexseq analysis.
Yes I think it is a good idea, just needs a bit of tweaking.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:46 AM, kittyl notifications@github.com wrote:
Ok. I think it would still be good if we can keep the counts_prepare part separate from the deseq and dexseq analysis.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/plagnollab/RNASeq_pipeline/issues/3#issuecomment-73027269 .
Vincent Plagnol University College London Genetics Institute Darwin building, office 210 Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT Cell: +44-(0)7946-546923 Office: +44-(0) 2031-084002 Website: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ugi/research/vincentplagnol
The latest version of DEXSeq no longer has this function. It has been replaced with DEXSeqDataSetFromHTSeq Will need to fix.