plaidfinch / ComonadSheet

A library for expressing "spreadsheet-like" computations with absolute and relative references, using fixed-points of n-dimensional comonads.
MIT License
155 stars 11 forks source link

Documentation on Hackage has broken links #4

Open gatlin opened 9 years ago

gatlin commented 9 years ago

Example

I mean, I don't feel entitled to anything since this is free and also a really incredible library, but fwiw the haddock documentation would be a little more convenient than reading through the source.

plaidfinch commented 9 years ago

Thanks for bringing this to my attention again; there was some issue in manually uploading documentation, and it appears not to have become fixed. I'll look at this issue as soon as I can.

Also: glad you like it! :) I would love to hear any feedback, use cases, etc. you care to share, esp. examples of other computations you've expressed in this framework.

plaidfinch commented 9 years ago

I should also mention that there are likely to be some (relatively small) changes coming up to the library sometime soon (read: when I get the chance to work on it), which also provides a convenient time for me to look into the documentation issue. In the meantime, you can build the documentation locally by doing cabal get ComonadSheet and then cabal haddock --html.

gatlin commented 9 years ago

Oh, certainly. That’s what I had done, I just figured since this is a really great library it should be maximally accessible so people will dive in.

On Mar 18, 2015, at 7:53 PM, Kenneth Foner notifications@github.com wrote:

I should also mention that there are likely to be some (relatively small) changes coming up to the library sometime soon (read: when I get the chance to work on it), which also provides a convenient time for me to look into the documentation issue. In the meantime, you can build the documentation locally by doing cabal get ComonadSheet and then cabal haddock --html.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/kwf/ComonadSheet/issues/4#issuecomment-83239182.