Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Yes, this should work and it needs to be fixed.
Original comment by mhahn...@gmail.com
on 1 Jun 2010 at 2:47
To be more clear on what I mean by "work," x should be a new reference that
initially points to the same object
that local does, but then changes. Local should still point to 5 after the
method call, i.e. the semantics should be
the same as Java's.
Original comment by mhahn...@gmail.com
on 1 Jun 2010 at 2:51
Does not generate wrong code anymore but see issue 41 for another related
problem.
Original comment by manuelmohr@gmail.com
on 10 Jun 2010 at 7:39
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
manuelmohr@gmail.com
on 1 Jun 2010 at 12:09