Closed purplespider closed 4 months ago
Thank you for your valuable input.
The notify_reply
message was missing.
It makes sense that if notify_reply
has not been set, notify_from
should be used. Therefore, I have made a change in the code, which can be found in version 3.4.1.
Thanks for looking at this so quickly!
However, I'm getting an error when trying to send on 3.4.1
In my config I have:
'microman.formblock' => [
'from_email' => ["info@example.com" => "My Website"],
],
And now, on 3.4.1, when trying to submit a form, it says: "Error sending notification: "My Website" is not a valid email address"
Seems to be related to this change.
I see the problem. Check Version 4.3.2...
Thanks, that does sort it, however, I've noticed that this approach forces you to manually specify notify_reply
which means it isn't possible to have an optional email field that is still used for the "reply to" address if it is filled in.
It would be nice if the fallback for notify_reply
could be your existing getEmail()
method, which automatically hunts out any existing email fields.
Something like this, perhaps: https://github.com/plain-solutions-gmbh/kirby-form-block-suite/pull/56
Looks good. Thanks for your PR. Please send me a email for a free kirby form block license for your effort. kirby@micorman.ch
It seems that if you want to use the "Send notification" option to send the submissions to the website owner, the form must have an email field, otherwise an error ("You need at least one field that is use for an email.") will occur. However, this requirement shouldn't really be necessary.
I have a website with a "Request a Callback" form, it asks for Name and Phone number, and I'd like submissions sent to the website owner, but I can't currently do this, as it errors unless I also put a required Email field on the form.
It seems the reason it requires an email field to set the "replyTo" header of the email, so if there isn't an email field, could this header just be omitted to allow the email to still be sent?