This looks good to me! I have a couple of comments, but they aren't blocking I don't think. Variables are named well following our established pattern, and the work is straightforward. The only issue is with the pyroscope application name variable. It works well now, but could cause an issue in the future, setup-depending.
This looks good to me! I have a couple of comments, but they aren't blocking I don't think. Variables are named well following our established pattern, and the work is straightforward. The only issue is with the pyroscope application name variable. It works well now, but could cause an issue in the future, setup-depending.