planetfederal / nielsen-styles

1 stars 0 forks source link

Market Grouping #30

Closed thunsucker closed 11 years ago

thunsucker commented 12 years ago

Please ensure that the market grouping hierarchy has line thickness/darkness at top with Nielsen DMA, followed by CSA and then lowest line thickness/lightness with CBSA. Thank you.

iwillig commented 12 years ago

Hey Tammy,

I think I fixed this but can you confirm that I have?

sgavin commented 12 years ago

it looks to me like DMA is still thinner at higher number zoom levels. If I'm at ZOOM 10 and have DMA on, and then turn on CBSA, the CBSA is the most prominent.

Need Tammy to validate the hierarchy.

thunsucker commented 12 years ago

Hierarchy of the market layers: Nielsen DMA should always be most prominent at all zoom layers, followed by CSA, then CBSA

thunsucker commented 12 years ago

I agree with Steve, at Zoom 10, CBSA is much more prominent than Nielsen DMA, this should be reversed: 1- DMA, 2- CSA 3- CBSA Thanks.

iwillig commented 12 years ago

Okay great thanks

iwillig commented 12 years ago

Check again? Is this better?

sgavin commented 12 years ago

Yes, it does look better.

Steve Gavin Senior Product Development Manager Segmentation & Local Market Solutions Nielsen Office: 858-550-5737

See what’s new at www.MyBestSegments.comhttp://www.mybestsegments.com/ and try out our ZIP Code Look-Up tool to discover the top consumer segments in your ZIP Code!

For any support issues, please contact the Nielsen Solution Center at 800-866-6511

This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

From: Ivan Willig [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 1:18 PM To: opengeo/nielsen-styles Cc: Gavin, Steve Subject: Re: [nielsen-styles] Market Grouping (#30)

Check again? Is this better?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/opengeo/nielsen-styles/issues/30#issuecomment-10425830.

iwillig commented 12 years ago

Better? Right? Does it suit the needs for the project? Should we change something else?

sgavin commented 12 years ago

For the Market Levels? I think it’s better. The only ZOOM level I still struggle w/ a little bit is 10/11, and that’s with both CSA and DMA on the map. It’s almost like CSA gets thicker at 10, but DMA doesn’t get thicker until 12. But otherwise I think the distinction is good.

Steve Gavin Senior Product Development Manager Segmentation & Local Market Solutions Nielsen Office: 858-550-5737

See what’s new at www.MyBestSegments.comhttp://www.mybestsegments.com/ and try out our ZIP Code Look-Up tool to discover the top consumer segments in your ZIP Code!

For any support issues, please contact the Nielsen Solution Center at 800-866-6511

This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

From: Ivan Willig [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 2:22 PM To: opengeo/nielsen-styles Cc: Gavin, Steve Subject: Re: [nielsen-styles] Market Grouping (#30)

Better? Right? Does it suit the needs for the project? Should we change something else?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/opengeo/nielsen-styles/issues/30#issuecomment-10428291.

thunsucker commented 12 years ago

Yes, I agree with Steve. It does seem that the hierarchy is not holding at different zoom levels. Can you explain or address?

iwillig commented 12 years ago

Yeah you guys are right.. Let me fix this after dinner...

Thanks.

iwillig commented 11 years ago

Can we close this? Or is it still an open issue?

thunsucker commented 11 years ago

appears fixed now, thanks