Closed GeoSot closed 1 year ago
I left the tests same, for the only reason, that they correctly check naming and types. So no breaking changes here.
As for the naming automation, I suppose will be slightly slower as it is not reflection but just passes through some functions.
note: the reason of this proposal, is the future thought of handlers supporting Casters, and following the mind, I am trying to merge functionalities under one class
In that case, perhaps just add a base class for the new functionality that you are looking to add as part of that change, but leave the methods as is, where possible. I don't think the inference magic is worth it here.
As almost all Handlers keep a naming pattern, I added an Abstraction, which provides the same name based on the existing convention