Open BrapiCoordinatorSelby opened 1 year ago
I see it that way as well.
BRAVA was designed for these two use cases, which was (still is?) linked to the BrAPI implementition phases for breeding data resources.
The second is to deliuver a metric to data consumer and developer about the quality of BrAPI endpoints.
@langeipk totally agree, I just think the priority of those use cases has flipped since BRAVA was first developed, and "Test your own" should be presented first. I think some of the other issues raised will help make the BRAVA weekly test more valuable, right now there are a lot of false negatives that need to be resolved, and its not particularly useful. I also have an item on my ever growing TODO list to pull the summary results from BRAVA and display them on the brapi.org/servers page to further deliver that quality metric
I would also add one additional use case that BRAVA should be designed for
There might be other opinions here, but I think the primary use case for Brava is to allow people to test their own servers in a one off test. I don't know of anyone who uses the recurring weekly test data. Perhaps we should highlight the "Test Your Own" page as the primary feature.