For what I can see in #197, and particularly in this commit the original idea was for the names to be what these PR indicates.
The idea behind this is that services-down should just stop the containers/volumes (so that it's the contrary to up), but doing down --volumes actually destroys volume data
For what I can see in #197, and particularly in this commit the original idea was for the names to be what these PR indicates.
The idea behind this is that
services-down
should just stop the containers/volumes (so that it's the contrary to up), but doingdown --volumes
actually destroys volume data