search

plazi / Biodiversity-Literature-Repository

covers the creating, maintenance and upload to the BLR
3 stars 0 forks source link

deprecated DOI for treatment #98

Open myrmoteras opened 3 years ago

myrmoteras commented 3 years ago

@gsautter in this case the DOI is deprecated https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4620973 , but still in the treatment http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/html/F035D85E9906FFF08106FBE4FC3C5559 and the stats. http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/srsStats/stats?outputFields=doc.uuid+doc.doi+doc.articleUuid+bib.year+bib.source+matCit.verbatimMatCit+matCit.typeStatus&groupingFields=doc.uuid+doc.doi+doc.articleUuid+bib.year+bib.source+matCit.verbatimMatCit+matCit.typeStatus&limit=100&FP-bib.year=2021&FP-bib.source=%22European%20Journal%20of%20Taxonomy%22&FP-matCit.typeStatus=holotype&format=HTML

0C0CA0269905FFF58355FFA4FFC1525C

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4561529 http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/html/F13387D2FF90C11BFB69FC24FB17372B

0D0AFFAAFF9FC10AF952FF89FFCF3516

gsautter commented 3 years ago

OK, this is weird ... normally, a treatment only ever gets "DEPRECATED" after a replacement is added to Zenodo; unless a wrongfully marked treatment is removed from the parent IMF altogether.

gsautter commented 3 years ago

The only reason I can imagine a treatment is not re-uploaded and linked is that after a change to the treatment boundaries, the attributes were not modified to indicate the change ... the latter works by removing the httpUri (if pointing to Zenodo) and ID-DIO attributes and setting the ID-Zenodo-Dep attribute to -2, with the latter value indicating an intentional flagging for re-upload to a new deposition with a new DOI. The same "replace the deposition, this is intentional" flagging also works for figures.

gsautter commented 3 years ago

Any idea how many of the treatment DOIs of the 2021 EJTs are "DEPRECATED"? Hard to tell without looking at each deposition individually ...

Repaired the two treatments you listed for now.