Open myrmoteras opened 5 years ago
@lnielsen some more info on this. The DataCite metadata documentation includes a isDerivedFrom
relationship (p54 of https://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.3/doc/DataCite-MetadataKernel_v4.3.pdf) in its description of Relation Types :
IsDerivedFrom
indicates B is a source upon which A is based
<relatedIdentifier
relatedIdentifierType="DOI"
relationType="IsDerivedFrom">10.6078/M7DZ067C
</relatedIdentifier>
IsDerivedFrom should be used for a resource that is a derivative
of an original resource.
In this example, the dataset is derived from a larger dataset
and data values have been manipulated from their original state.
This seems to be closest to what is needed, but it is not available among the relationType values in the Zenodo upload metadata. Also, DataCite does not provide an inverse for this type ; and Im not sure what it would be , something like "hasDerivation"?
We can review the relation types we have available at the moment on Zeondo and add the ones that are missing. I have a strong feeling that we've just "missed" some of these and forgot to add them to the deposit form (i.e. they can be submitted through the REST API, but won't be visible in the deposit form). I've opened https://github.com/zenodo/zenodo/issues/1862 to track it on Zenodo
@lnielsen what is the right term to define in the relationship between the representation of the article in GBIF, based on the DWC-Archive and the deposit in Zenodo?
the relationship should be "derived from" but this does not exist in Zenodo
see also https://github.com/plazi/Plazi-Communications/issues/930