search

plazi / community

This repo is intended to serve as a help desk for TreatmentBank-users.
6 stars 1 forks source link

to be processed https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15928 #115

Open myrmoteras opened 2 years ago

myrmoteras commented 2 years ago

can you process this article and then let's discuss how we create this treatment

https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15928 mec.15928.pdf

image

this is part of the CAS press release

flsimoes commented 2 years ago

Perhaps something like this? reference_group followed by nomenclature

image
myrmoteras commented 2 years ago

it would be the other way round: discussion We recommend regognizing these lineages as distinct species and remove Nomenclature S.ephele referenceGroup 1965 from synonymy with S. thomenses (Bocage 1873)

flsimoes commented 2 years ago

it would be the other way round: discussion We recommend regognizing these lineages as distinct species and remove Nomenclature S.ephele referenceGroup 1965 from synonymy with S. thomenses (Bocage 1873)

Ah yes, I misread the sentence.

myrmoteras commented 2 years ago

let me know, when this is done - an interesting contrast to what CAS writes in tis press release

flsimoes commented 2 years ago

let me know, when this is done - an interesting contrast to what CAS writes in tis press release

@truschel has already made the extraction though she didn't upload it as she was waiting for the discussion on the treatment.

truschel commented 2 years ago

@myrmoteras @flsimoes It is done. UUID: FFD3FF8CFFADFFC2561DC867781DFFAC TB: http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFD3FF8CFFADFFC2561DC867781DFFAC Zenodo: https://zenodo.org/record/5827681#.Ydgy8WjMLcc

myrmoteras commented 2 years ago

Shouldn't there be two species? The original and the one that has been taken out of synonymy?

Get Outlook for Androidhttps://aka.ms/AAb9ysg

From: truschel @.> Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 1:42:00 PM To: plazi/community @.> Cc: Donat Agosti @.>; Mention @.> Subject: Re: [plazi/community] to be processed https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15928 (Issue #115)

EXTERNAL SENDER

@myrmoterashttps://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fmyrmoteras&data=04%7C01%7C%7C7d86742ea72f424dfc1008d9d1db1978%7Cbe0003e8c6b9496883aeb34586974b76%7C0%7C0%7C637771561223228341%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=XNQpMUFhe2KOqwgpP79MJ%2Bu1P%2Fs7mqGRMGARYFstwwY%3D&reserved=0 @flsimoeshttps://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fflsimoes&data=04%7C01%7C%7C7d86742ea72f424dfc1008d9d1db1978%7Cbe0003e8c6b9496883aeb34586974b76%7C0%7C0%7C637771561223228341%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=jk0%2FShCCPHUz2wqnvu%2B4wx9d1CO%2FA56AaReCVwPMIcc%3D&reserved=0 It is done. UUID: FFD3FF8CFFADFFC2561DC867781DFFAC TB: http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFD3FF8CFFADFFC2561DC867781DFFAChttps://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpublication.plazi.org%2Fid%2FFFD3FF8CFFADFFC2561DC867781DFFAC&data=04%7C01%7C%7C7d86742ea72f424dfc1008d9d1db1978%7Cbe0003e8c6b9496883aeb34586974b76%7C0%7C0%7C637771561223228341%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=nvlJsnKBjwUZzNIHl5c%2BIxanh5248v0dS%2BMQ0TNzfnA%3D&reserved=0 Zenodo: https://zenodo.org/record/5827681#.Ydgy8WjMLcchttps://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fzenodo.org%2Frecord%2F5827681%23.Ydgy8WjMLcc&data=04%7C01%7C%7C7d86742ea72f424dfc1008d9d1db1978%7Cbe0003e8c6b9496883aeb34586974b76%7C0%7C0%7C637771561223228341%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=rc3IHgd%2B%2BzjAs5lfTPVWtiaBxw7dbO0%2Bb1%2F8x%2BWl6%2Fk%3D&reserved=0

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fplazi%2Fcommunity%2Fissues%2F115%23issuecomment-1007377916&data=04%7C01%7C%7C7d86742ea72f424dfc1008d9d1db1978%7Cbe0003e8c6b9496883aeb34586974b76%7C0%7C0%7C637771561223228341%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=GH%2FBj0QMexbJrD5Ac4l6LBDmKWdYUnT1%2B4aKyb64700%3D&reserved=0, or unsubscribehttps://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FABDFPJHUTMVE3NDSNAJI2ZDUU3NRRANCNFSM5LL4SDOQ&data=04%7C01%7C%7C7d86742ea72f424dfc1008d9d1db1978%7Cbe0003e8c6b9496883aeb34586974b76%7C0%7C0%7C637771561223228341%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=bASO3zCb0CDpiurcrCJA%2BlyU4VY0MncOXUfQRD%2FWMp0%3D&reserved=0. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

flsimoes commented 2 years ago

@truschel please see @myrmoteras's comment I think it went under your radar

flsimoes commented 1 month ago

Since this was left hanging I decided to take another look at it.

Even though there are technically two species being "treated", there isn't enough text to warrant two treatments, in my view.

Currently we have a treatment for Schistometopum ephele: discussion we recommend recognizing these lineages as distinct species and remove nomenclature S. ephele Taylor, 1965 reference_group from synonymy with S. thomense (Bocage 1873).

If we were to split these into two treatments, we would lose information for each of them.