extant asteroids (Echinodermata) has many higher taxonomy errors

[rossmounce]

GBIF dataset here: https://www.gbif.org/dataset/83dc5b45-5596-4a84-ab44-8b2f4d777110 "The type specimens of extant asteroids (Echinodermata) in the Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle of Paris"

ought to be just echinodermata but...

error taxa include:

• 5 different taxa of Culcita as plants

  • https://www.gbif.org/species/195867157
  • https://www.gbif.org/species/195867154
  • https://www.gbif.org/species/195867156
  • https://www.gbif.org/species/195867152
  • https://www.gbif.org/species/195867246

• 2 taxa tagged as Radiozoa

  • https://www.gbif.org/species/195867006
  • https://www.gbif.org/species/195867004

• many taxa tagged as Coccolithophyceae

  • https://www.gbif.org/species/195867382
  • https://www.gbif.org/species/195866987
  • https://www.gbif.org/species/195867383
  • https://www.gbif.org/species/195867263

• taxa tagged as fungi

  • https://www.gbif.org/species/195867647/verbatim

...lots of errors in this dataset and I may not have listed them all here.

[Carol-Sokolowicz]

I performed an extesive review in all names of the paper. If you see somenthing else odd let me now.