Closed retog closed 2 years ago
It would be vastly helpful to know one of the example URLs you tested this with, so I get an idea which servlet to look at ...
Sorry I cannot quote an RFC for how to write a maximally useful ticket to bolster my request.
It affects any treatment, e.g. http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03ACBF18FFDF1B3AFF31FA64FC1AEA83
To test it with curl
:
curl -D - 'http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03ACBF18FFDF1B3AFF31FA64FC1AEA83' -H 'Accept: text/turtle;q=1, application/n-triples;q=.9, application/rdf+xml;q=.8, application/ld+json;q=.7'
Done, should be working now ... turns out, even though Tomcat offers an enumeration for request headers with multiple values, it does not seem to properly parse these comma separated lists ... doing that in our own code now for the Accept
header.
With Accept-Header
application/rdf+xml
the server correctly returns RDF/XML. However, with the Accept-Header set toAccept: text/turtle;q=1, application/n-triples;q=.9, application/rdf+xml;q=.8, application/ld+json;q=.7, */*;q=.1
the server responds with text/html, which means that the server thinks that even after a quality markdown of 70% HTML is the best available format (RFC 7231 Sec. 5.3.2).Even the header is set to 'text/turtle;q=1, application/n-triples;q=.9, application/rdf+xml;q=.8, application/ld+json;q=.7' the server returns HTML. This is just wrong, as text/html isn't acceptable at all according to this request.