search

plepe / OpenStreetBrowser

An application to ‘browse’ the information in the displayed part of the map. Similar to common Wikis and also the main page of http://www.openstreetmap.org the website shows a narrow menu on the left side, most of the page is used for the display of the map. In contrast to most Wikis the menu is not static, but rather the content of the map can be browsed in categories. For the map a special style has been developed (sorry guys, I neither like the default Mapnik nor Osmarender styles), and special overlays are displayed to support the current browsed categories. When you click on an object (either from the list or directly on the map) informations on this object are displayed.
http://www.openstreetbrowser.org
GNU General Public License v3.0
88 stars 20 forks source link

Ignore private swimming pools #122

Closed pangoSE closed 2 years ago

pangoSE commented 4 years ago

See https://www.openstreetbrowser.org/#leisure/w546924815&map=17/62.62219/17.91993&categories=leisure,wikipedia This pool is tagged access=private and I think we should ignore those.

plepe commented 4 years ago

Hmm, there's a special "Swimming and Bathing" category, which ignores private swimming pools. The leisure category just contains everything tagged leisure=* ...

Maybe the Leisure category should ignore all private things? Or is there a special reason just to ignore private swimming pools?

plepe commented 4 years ago

Any thought on the issue?

trapicki commented 4 years ago

I find private swimming pools less interresting, in fact annoying and distracting.

In general, when using OpenStreetbrowser, first I'm interested in things that I can use by myself. If I want to know more in depth details, I'd like to activate them separately.

In this very case, I'd prefer public accessible leisure=*, with a subcategory like "including private".

plepe commented 4 years ago

The leisure category now excludes all private objects by default. There's a filter to change this behaviour (resp. query for specific access-values). There will be an announcement about this soon[tm].

Hufkratzer commented 2 years ago

I think "publicly accessible" should show anything with access=yes and also anything with without an access tag; in other words, it should include "empty value". access=yes is usually omitted.

plepe commented 2 years ago

The default (currently) for the leisure-category is, to exclude access=private. All other access values and also a missing access-tag are included. The filter value is labelled "non-private".

Other values include public, permissive, customers, unknown, discouraged. I guess you could discuss which values should by default be included, but I would rather say yes.

dpriskorn commented 2 years ago

Nice 😀