Closed cfr42 closed 7 years ago
Consider the following example:
\begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib} @incollection{incoll, author = {Claus, Santa}, title = {The Aerodynamics of Modern the Modern Sleigh}, pages = {34--98}, crossref = {coll}} @collection{collect, ids = {coll}, title = {Airborne Gift Distribution: Technical Considerations}, editor = {Nicholas, Saint}, year = 2013, publisher = {Rudolph Press}, address = {Greenland}} \end{filecontents} \documentclass{article} \usepackage[mincrossrefs=6]{biblatex} \bibliography{\jobname} \begin{document} \Textcite{incoll}. \printbibliography \end{document}
I would expect this to yield a single bibliography entry, whereas I actually get two (output).
Ref.: http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/354567/saint-nicholass-airborne-gift-distribution-can-biblatex-biber-respect-mincross
This was a tricky bug, now fixed in 2.8 DEV which is uploaded to SourceForge.
Consider the following example:
I would expect this to yield a single bibliography entry, whereas I actually get two (output).
Ref.: http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/354567/saint-nicholass-airborne-gift-distribution-can-biblatex-biber-respect-mincross