Consider the following MWE with an unknown entry type @unknowntype
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{biblatex}
\begin{filecontents*}[overwrite]{\jobname.bib}
@unknowntype{sigfridsson,
author = {Sigfridsson, Emma and Ryde, Ulf},
title = {Comparison of methods for deriving atomic charges from the
electrostatic potential and moments},
journaltitle = {Journal of Computational Chemistry},
date = 1998,
volume = 19,
number = 4,
pages = {377-395},
doi = {10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199803)19:4<377::AID-JCC1>3.0.CO;2-P},
}
\end{filecontents*}
\addbibresource{\jobname.bib}
\begin{document}
\cite{sigfridsson}
\printbibliography
\end{document}
The .bbl file will contain
\refsection{0}
\datalist[entry]{nty/global//global/global}
\entry{sigfridsson}{}{}
\name{author}{2}{}{%
{{hash=484061f383fb3b729627e12ab42c1963}{%
family={Sigfridsson},
familyi={S\bibinitperiod},
given={Emma},
giveni={E\bibinitperiod}}}%
{{hash=b7e299b632e5db12681c2decc8ce023f}{%
family={Ryde},
familyi={R\bibinitperiod},
given={Ulf},
giveni={U\bibinitperiod}}}%
}
\strng{namehash}{d9015d9f08448ab0cb194bd964d7b44b}
\strng{fullhash}{d9015d9f08448ab0cb194bd964d7b44b}
\strng{bibnamehash}{d9015d9f08448ab0cb194bd964d7b44b}
\strng{authorbibnamehash}{d9015d9f08448ab0cb194bd964d7b44b}
\strng{authornamehash}{d9015d9f08448ab0cb194bd964d7b44b}
\strng{authorfullhash}{d9015d9f08448ab0cb194bd964d7b44b}
\field{sortinit}{S}
\field{sortinithash}{c319cff79d99c853d775f88277d4e45f}
\field{labelnamesource}{author}
\field{labeltitlesource}{title}
\field{journaltitle}{Journal of Computational Chemistry}
\field{number}{4}
\field{title}{Comparison of methods for deriving atomic charges from the electrostatic potential and moments}
\field{volume}{19}
\field{year}{1998}
\field{dateera}{ce}
\field{pages}{377\bibrangedash 395}
\range{pages}{19}
\verb{doi}
\verb 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199803)19:4<377::AID-JCC1>3.0.CO;2-P
\endverb
\endentry
\enddatalist
\endrefsection
\endinput
i.e. it will give the entry type as an empty string. This is a counter-intuitive result.
Given the discussions in https://github.com/plk/biber/issues/242 I'm not sure which of the following two solutions I would prefer, but I'd say either is preferable to just nulling the entry type
Remap unknown types to @misc.
Keep unknown types.
Keep unknown types but normalise the capitalisation of the entry type field.
Fixed in DEV branch. Unknown types are retained as-is. I never liked the "normalise to @misc" as the chances of that giving the desired output were always slim.
From https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/520657/35864
Consider the following MWE with an unknown entry type
@unknowntype
The
.bbl
file will containi.e. it will give the entry type as an empty string. This is a counter-intuitive result.
I suppose this behaviour comes from the implementation of the case-folding for entry types implemented for https://github.com/plk/biber/issues/278.
Given the discussions in https://github.com/plk/biber/issues/242 I'm not sure which of the following two solutions I would prefer, but I'd say either is preferable to just nulling the entry type
@misc
.