Open araujoms opened 6 months ago
Should hopefully be fixed in https://github.com/plk/biblatex/commit/ac2456c2492861451547659702ae4a72264e4997.
The class loads bits of RevTeX and thus has a non-standard definition of \addtocontents
that we cannot patch. The fix adds code to deal also with RevTeX's definition of \addtocontents
.
This specific problem was fixed, but another appeared: the numbering of references doesn't work (with the style phys
), they all get the number 0. I tried with both the bibtex
and biber
backends.
Hmmm, ... fascinating. Somehow ltxgrid
and biblatex
clash so that the .aux
file is closed before we can write all our data to that file. I'll see if I can isolate the problem more precisely.
Am an one of the developers of quantumarticle. Thanks for looking into this! Is there anything we could do on our end to make resolving this easier?
@cgogolin Thanks for getting in touch. I'm not sure there is any immediate relief you could offer (because I assume you need ltxgrid
and can't just drop it). But if you want to, you can help us figure out why ltxgrid
prematurely closes the .aux
for biblatex
.
I haven't looked at this in the last weeks, but when I investigated the issue after the initial report it seemed pretty tricky. So I don't think I can promise any progress in the near future.
If I try to compile with the document class quantumarticle, which is the default class for the journal Quantum, I get the cryptic error
! Package biblatex Error: Patching \addtocontents failed.
This is a regression, as it used to work in TeXLive 2020. I upgraded to TeXLive 2023 (together with the arXiv), and now it doesn't.
MWE: