search

plnrbrt / STA9750-2024-FALL

Projects from STA9750 - FALL 2024
0 stars 0 forks source link

ISSUE FOR MP03 PEER FEEDBACK - OPENED BY INSTRUCTOR #4

Open michaelweylandt opened 1 week ago

michaelweylandt commented 1 week ago

Thanks @plnrbrt !

Peer Feedback:

It is now time for the peer feedback round for Mini-Project 03. Please review @plnrbrt's submission for this mini-project and provide peer feedback.

Using the rubric at https://michael-weylandt.com/STA9750/miniprojects/mini03.html#rubric, please grade their submission out of a total of 50 points. Note that this rubric is slightly different than that used for Mini-Projects 01 and 02.

For each of the five categories, please give them a separate score and provide a total (sum) score across the entire assignment. Feel free to assign extra credit if you feel it is warranted (following the rubric).

If you give a score of less than 5 for any category, please provide a suggestion for improvement. (You can also give suggestions for any element they did well - more feedback is always great!)

As you go through this peer feedback exercise, think about what you particularly like about this submission and how you can incorporate that approach in your future work. If something is particularly insightful or creative, give some kudos!

Evaluators: This should take you around 15 minutes per peer feedback. You are not required to engage in substantial back-and-forth with @plnrbrt, but you are of course welcome to initiate a discussion.

@plnrbrt: please engage fully with your peers. They are here to help you!

Submission URL should be: https://plnrbrt.github.io/STA9750-2024-FALL/mp03.html

Feel free to link to other repos, the course documentation, or other useful examples.

Thanks! @michaelweylandt

CC: @charles-ramirez

velasco23 commented 6 days ago

hi @plnrbrt I could not find you project via https://plnrbrt.github.io/STA9750-2024-FALL/mp03.html

Gautam-1-R commented 6 days ago

Hi @plnrbrt Can't be able to find your project. Please check it once by your side.

laurencardieri commented 5 days ago

I also cannot view the project :/

plnrbrt commented 4 days ago

Hello Everyone, So sorry I made some changes because I didn't understood some of the context (I am Frecnh so quite learning a lot here about the american election system) and my visual was not accurate and I had troubles pushing everything back to my website. It is available now, please feel free to check it out when you have time!

@velasco23 @laurencardieri @Gautam-1-R @doreenmurekerisoni

Gautam-1-R commented 4 days ago

Hi @plnrbrt

Please find below my comments, thanks!

Written Communication: 8/10 The report is clear and easy to follow. A summary of findings in Task 4 should be added along with a citation section to complete the project.

Project Skeleton: 8.5/10 Structure is good. Include a concluding summary to tie it all together.

Formatting & Display: 9/10 Graphs are nice! Task 5 should add more labeling on Y-axes for clarity.

Code Quality: 8.5/10 Well-organized code! In Task 3's data transformation, adding comments would help someone understand it more.

Data Preparation: 10/10 Data preparation is thorough and well addressed.

Total- 44/50

plnrbrt commented 3 days ago

Hi @Gautam-1-R Thank you very much for your feedbacks! I will keep those in mind for the next mini-project!