Open plocket opened 4 years ago
I'm actually really interested in a relationship with these groups, but not the one I heard described, and we didn't get to discuss this more. I voted either neutral or against, but it was only because of the way the action was proposed.
What I'm against is reaching out to these groups with a general call for participation. I think it would be harmful to our relationship with them. If there's no specific need for their skills, they'll come over and have no role and I believe people will then stop coming and be less likely to listen to another request for help.
What I'd prefer is some relationship with this other group where specific existing needs could be communicated when they come up. That would include a detailed description of the need -immediate development of a product vs. relationship building vs. whatever else.
I'd be very interested in that relationship.
I was a neutral vote and I kind of wish this had been a fist-to-five vote instead of a thumb vote. I would have given this a 4️⃣
@thadk : What reservations did you have and how might they be addressed?
I just didn't want to lead it necessarily.
@thadk : It might be worth revisiting the discussion, then. I thought the vote was about bringing it to the core team, not whether we ourselves would lead it. Shall we switch this back to 'Proposal' instead of 'Decision'?
See #29, Strategically market CfB at other skill-based Meetups.
PROPOSAL (rejected): Market CfB at other skill-based Meetups
Why
Projects are having hard times finding members with the skills they need.
How
Market CFB at other (Project management, agile, etc.) meetups likely to have skilled volunteers needed by groups.
Proposal History
01/23/20