Open dwinchell opened 3 years ago
@BillBensing you good with this?
I believe the latest I heard on this, we're looking for TsscPlatform
-> Platform
and TsscPipeline
-> Pipeline
. Can you confirm @BillBensing
Tossing in my unsolicited 2c, what about TsscPlatform
-> SoftwareFactory
and TsscPipeline
-> SoftwareFactoryPipeline
(or SoftwarePipeline
) ? They make the CRs more expressive about the specific concept that they represent and that the Operator will create. Plus it aligns with the PSFO name :)
Pipeline
conflicts with Tekton from a naming perspective, even though the API group is different. Users would have both Tekton Pipeline
and Ploigos Pipeline
in the same namespace if Tekton is their CI tool, adding a potential source of confusion for them.
If there's an appetite for it, I have a local commit and branch (not yet pushed) that renames everything to SoftwareFactory
and SoftwareFactoryPipeline
. Local molecule tests pass. If we prefer Platform
and Pipeline
the change is cosmetic and quick; let me know and I'll push it up.
TsscPlatform -> PloigosPlatform TsscPipeline -> PloigosPipeline