Closed mauritsvanrees closed 2 months ago
In fact, I think the two lists can be merged. Currently, if a package is in IGNORE_NO_JENKINS
but not in IGNORE_NO_TEST_NEEDED
, then:
IGNORE_NO_JENKINS
?]So I think we should merge the two lists. I have not yet done so in this PR.
@gforcada Can you check if my reasoning is correct?
Looks you are right, the two lists could be merged 👍🏾
We can keep it like this PR that you made, and later do a follow up PR.
I will merge and deploy it.
We already have it in the
IGNORE_NO_TEST_NEEDED
, but the comment asking to trigger Jenkins jobs is still added.Actually, if a package is in
IGNORE_NO_TEST_NEEDED
, then even if you would trigger Jenkins jobs, nothing would happen, if I follow the code correctly. Indeed, I added that comment for triggering the jobs, but the robots log says:So let me add another commit to this PR to add the
IGNORE_NO_TEST_NEEDED
packages toIGNORE_NO_JENKINS
.