Closed TegveerG closed 1 year ago
see my comments in: ploomber/ploomber-engine#79 (review)
please start a new PR because this one went bad (there are modified files that shouldn't be modified)
Understood, working on a new PR and discarding heteroscedasticity issue (tried killing 2 birds with 1 stone). The files that shouldn't be modified did so due to pkgmt format
and pkgmt lint
. For the sklearn-evaluation project, should those commands be run before pushing?
@TegveerG: my bad, if this is only formatting. then that's ok, we can take this PR even with this modified files
I think let's open a separate PR for the heteroscedasticity issue
Describe your changes
Added
PLOOMBER_VERSION_CHECK_DISABLED=true
underpre_build:
in.readthedocs.yml
While doing the above task, I fixed statsmodels functionality by adding it insetup.py
and fixed linting forRegressionPlots.ipynb
Issue number
Closes https://github.com/ploomber/contributing/issues/26 Closes #166
Checklist before requesting a review
pkgmt format
:books: Documentation preview :books:: https://sklearn-evaluation--333.org.readthedocs.build/en/333/