Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
I do not think we can do this -- this list comes from the SAML 2.0 metadata
specification:
contactType [Required]
Specifies the type of contact using the ContactTypeType enumeration. The possible values are technical, support, administrative, billing, and other.
See:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/35391/sstc-saml-metadata-errat
a-2.0-wd-04-diff.pdf
Original comment by olavmrk@gmail.com
on 28 Jun 2012 at 9:36
The SAML spec says it can be done (have additional contact types next to
technical), but simpleSAMLphp can't do it?
Not quite sure I understand what you mean when you say we can't do this... spec
violation? simpleSAMLphp limitation?
Original comment by mooknarf@gmail.com
on 29 Jun 2012 at 7:33
Oh, sorrry -- I misread your original message. I thought you wanted additional
contact type in addition to the ones you listed. Leaving this issue open then
Original comment by olavmrk@gmail.com
on 29 Jun 2012 at 10:05
I'm trying to implement this, but am a bit confused as to where to do this:
[fkooman@localhost ssp]$ find | grep metadata.php | grep -v svn
./modules/saml/www/sp/metadata.php
./modules/core/www/show_metadata.php
./www/saml2/idp/metadata.php
./www/saml2/sp/metadata.php
./www/shib13/idp/metadata.php
./www/shib13/sp/metadata.php
./templates/metadata.php
[fkooman@localhost ssp]$
It seems modules/saml/www/sp/metadata.php is actually used, while the same
functionality also seems implemented in www/saml2/sp/metadata.php. Which one to
use?
Original comment by mooknarf@gmail.com
on 4 Jul 2012 at 7:52
There are actually two SAML 2.0 SPs in simpleSAMLphp -- the old (in
www/saml2/sp) and the new (in modules/saml). The old is only included for
backwardscompatibility.
Generally, updates should be made to the new one.
Original comment by olavmrk@gmail.com
on 4 Jul 2012 at 7:57
Here a tiny patch to add support for other contact types in SP metadata
(configured in config/authsources.php).
Original comment by mooknarf@gmail.com
on 8 Apr 2013 at 8:27
Attachments:
Could you also document this option in modules/saml/docs/sp.txt, and maybe add
an example?
Original comment by olavmrk@gmail.com
on 8 Apr 2013 at 9:01
Done, is this what you had in mind?
Thanks!
Original comment by mooknarf@gmail.com
on 9 Apr 2013 at 7:17
Attachments:
Thanks! Applied in r3235.
Original comment by olavmrk@gmail.com
on 10 Apr 2013 at 6:21
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mooknarf@gmail.com
on 28 Jun 2012 at 9:31