The test for set_language was changed to follow the new set_locale test. They assert that the side-effect happened to the plist file, which I'm not sure it's according to the rest of the tests, but checking quickly it doesn't look to be a problem. If the old test was preferred please let me know and I switch change back to that.
Coverage increased (+0.03%) to 95.148% when pulling d54806f41b65adebc7ee583b45c3d4bfc4c5c7c6 on luizmb:master into bbb47b5b2affc5bd494b2a2449d7150c06d2a182 on plu:master.
The test for
set_language
was changed to follow the newset_locale
test. They assert that the side-effect happened to the plist file, which I'm not sure it's according to the rest of the tests, but checking quickly it doesn't look to be a problem. If the old test was preferred please let me know and I switch change back to that.