Open jenshweber opened 8 years ago
Not a bug, the semantics is that if an optional element is not present, the sequence must stop there. I.e. in regex it's like (o1 (o2 r)?)? not o1? o2? r
We will try to clarify that in the readme, or if you want to take a crack at it that would be even better :). Thanks!
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016, 4:56 AM Jens Weber notifications@github.com wrote:
Hello, I am trying to understand the behaviour of the option element in the FancySeq example on the Readme page. The following throws a validation error:
(s/validate FancySeq ["test" 1 2 3])
Why is this so? I think it should validate fine, since they keyword is optional. Is this a bug, or do I fail to understand the notion of optionality? Thanks Jens
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/plumatic/schema/issues/348
Hello, I am trying to understand the behaviour of the option element in the
FancySeq
example on the Readme page. The following throws a validation error:(s/validate FancySeq ["test" 1 2 3])
Why is this so? I think it should validate fine, since they keyword is optional. Is this a bug, or do I fail to understand the notion of optionality? Thanks Jens