Open srghma opened 2 months ago
On Tuesday, 30-Jul-24 17:49:27 UTC
by Gov4Git dev
stdumj
Started managing this issue, using the Plural Management Protocol v1, as Gov4Git concern 963
with initial priority score of 0.000000
.
This project is managed by Gov4Git, a decentralized governance system for collaborative git projects. To participate in governance, install the Gov4Git desktop app.
enih6w
This issue's priority score is now 0.000000
.
The cost of priority is 0.000000
.
The projected bounty is now 0.000000
.
and2ok
The set of eligible proposals claiming this issue is empty.
Here
https://github.com/pluralitybook/plurality/blob/fe451b9bbe0a77a6eaf8796a3c000f19bd0dc168/contents/english/5-6-%E2%BF%BB-voting.md?plain=1#L37
You argue that "proportional representation" == "plurality", therefore good
No, humans cannot live without leader! (even after we will merge our brains into one)
You propose to worsen the leader election!
Worsen, because it will make the identification and filtering of bad actors - harder. (group of people will never admit mistakes)
The real improvement is to make culling cycles - FASTER and experiments - EASIER TO INTERPRET
CRUX
From book "Beginning of infinity" by David Deutsch:
therefore, I, srghma, think that:
https://srghma.github.io/universe
https://srghma.github.io/how-life-was-created
My ideal country looks like this
https://x.com/AntipenkoL3792/status/1809934053275254875
https://x.com/AntipenkoL3792/status/1809940410992919038
Here, in this video David Deutsch argues that FPTP voting is better than Condorcet voting.
Yes, it is better, but in Federal representation (100 chairs for each best one in district) or proportional representation (100 chairs for each party) BECAUSE they are already fucked up, hard to cull out. Condorcet voting will make even worse.
But I think when You have presidential system + short experiments - You get best from both worlds - strong leader and impossibility of dictatorship (just don't vote to make experiments longer). And now, now - yes, now the Condorcet voting becomes better than FPTP.
And of course, the number of chairs in parliament should be equal to number of people in country, everyone should vote
All-country-parliament + 1 quick leader, NOT the infinite "rule of 100 chairs"