Open pmachata opened 9 years ago
It is awkward, error prone, and not future-proof to have to write ((?DW_TAG_const_type || ?DW_TAG_volatile_type || ...) @DW_AT_type)*. A new peelable DW_TAG_atomic_type will be added to Dwarf 5, so clearly future-proofing is necessary.
((?DW_TAG_const_type || ?DW_TAG_volatile_type || ...) @DW_AT_type)*
DW_TAG_atomic_type
It is awkward, error prone, and not future-proof to have to write
((?DW_TAG_const_type || ?DW_TAG_volatile_type || ...) @DW_AT_type)*. A new peelableDW_TAG_atomic_typewill be added to Dwarf 5, so clearly future-proofing is necessary.