Open giulioz opened 4 years ago
does yoga have stuff that we dont need?
We have to investigate that, surely yes, also the current build includes a lot of useless C++ glue code that is really useless and it compiles to asm.js. Wasm binary would be way more efficient, even though it would need a binary to be served like draco.
that sounds amazing!
We have to investigate that, surely yes, also the current build includes a lot of useless C++ glue code that is really useless and it compiles to asm.js. Wasm binary would be way more efficient, even though it would need a binary to be served like draco.
WASM binary takes time to load tho
but I doubt that yoga binary will be big
so I think it's ok to ship as wasm
if it suspends it would be ok if it takes a little to load, similar to gltf assets, textures and so on.
Look at https://github.com/dead/typeflex It's typescript port of Facebook's Yoga
It's only 23kb(gzip) https://bundlephobia.com/package/typeflex@0.1.0
While yoga-layout-prebuilt 78kb(gzip) https://bundlephobia.com/package/yoga-layout-prebuilt@1.10.0
@gut4 as i understand it has the same api? Looking pretty good, did you have any experience using it?
Ok, it's not the same api, but potentially it can be migrated to without too much hassle (methink). However, I'd be happy to see some benchmarks I started the barebone here https://github.com/saitonakamura/yoga-js-benchmarks, but if some will point me to already calculated results, i'd be grateful
We should build our version of yoga to reduce bundle size