The starter pack broker keeps track of provisioned services in-memory and is blissfully ignorant of any previous doings when restarted. At a minimum, a persistent table to map instance IDs between the marketplace and the service provider worlds would be very useful.
Is there a best practice for keeping state and metadata of service instances in the scope of a specific broker? Would having the broker annotate the service catalog serviceinstance objects be a reasonable approach?
I've tried keeping state in a kubernetes custom resource. It's proven a convenient way to achieve persistence, but this is probably not the ideal use of CRDs and introducing another entity with it's own lifecycle is a sure way to end up with inconsistency issues, speaking from experience.
Minibroker uses configmaps and labels on related k8s resources to persist data. If that weren't enough, I would lean towards using CRDs over a separate data store, because then I'd have to backup 2 databases. 😀
The starter pack broker keeps track of provisioned services in-memory and is blissfully ignorant of any previous doings when restarted. At a minimum, a persistent table to map instance IDs between the marketplace and the service provider worlds would be very useful.
Is there a best practice for keeping state and metadata of service instances in the scope of a specific broker? Would having the broker annotate the service catalog serviceinstance objects be a reasonable approach?
I've tried keeping state in a kubernetes custom resource. It's proven a convenient way to achieve persistence, but this is probably not the ideal use of CRDs and introducing another entity with it's own lifecycle is a sure way to end up with inconsistency issues, speaking from experience.