Closed lilic closed 6 years ago
@carolynvs 👍 So maybe we should rename the broker
in the lib then? Any naming suggestions for that one? Couldn't come up with anything myself, that sounded descriptive enough.
@LiliC Oops! I fat fingered that comment and I'm not sure how to edit it now. I was trying to say that using the same package name is NOT a problem for me. 😊
LGTM, thanks for the patch @LiliC
@carolynvs That makes more sense! :D
As the other pkgs were separated to its own library it makes more sense to call the
user
pkgbroker
instead. This also avoids the need for the consumer to later rename theuser
pkg, as the name is generic enough that it can be kept.As agreed @pmorie this renames the
user
pkg tobroker
. Not surebroker
is the best name, as there is thebroker
pkg ingithub.com/pmorie/osb-broker-lib/pkg/broker
as well? WDYT?