The paper mentions using the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, while the actual license file is the MIT No Attribution License (mostly - there's slight text difference, https://opensource.org/license/mit-0/). It doesn't look like CC BY 4 is OSI approved (at least, I can't find it in their approved list), but MIT-0 is.
Please unify the license choices with an OSI-approved license.
The paper mentions using the
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
license, while the actual license file is theMIT No Attribution License
(mostly - there's slight text difference, https://opensource.org/license/mit-0/). It doesn't look like CC BY 4 is OSI approved (at least, I can't find it in their approved list), but MIT-0 is.Please unify the license choices with an OSI-approved license.
[This is part of JOSS review https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5554]