Open pnutzz-0207 opened 2 years ago
Note the third point and the fifth point of this section of the UG. As there is no ...
in the viewGroup explanation (see screenshot below), only the last tag should be considered, which is the expected behaviour of UniGenda.
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
UG - viewGroup not detailed enough
Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.
The UG did not specify what will happen when multiple tags are entered. The actual output is that only the last tag given will be processed.
[original: nus-cs2103-AY2122S2/pe-interim#2850] [original labels: severity.Low type.DocumentationBug]
[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]
Note the third point and the fifth point of this section of the UG. As there is no
...
in the viewGroup explanation, only the last tag should be considered, which is the expected behaviour of UniGenda.
Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Team chose [type.DocumentationBug
]
Originally [type.FeatureFlaw
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
The UG did not specify what will happen when multiple tags are entered after
viewGroup
. Users do not know what to expect.Expectation 1: error message pops out Expectation 2: Shows all users that attaches to the tags given
Actual: Only the tag at the last will be given. For example: