Closed DemiMarie closed 5 years ago
It previously returned 0 both for a node that was not known to be inactive, and for the first inactive node.
It actually looks like poolsInactive[index] != _who is already checked in all the call sites. Is this change necessary at all?
poolsInactive[index] != _who
It previously returned 0 both for a node that was not known to be inactive, and for the first inactive node.