Open obiltschnig opened 8 years ago
I would like to ask whether we are making any progress here?
No progress yet, unfortunately. I'd like to see that in 1.8, but I can't make any promises whether I'll find the time to do it. Contributions, anyone?
+1
+1
+1
+1
Since YAML is quite complex, using an existing C++ YAML implementation and bending it to our needs may be a good approach.
This one looks promising.
This looks like a sane subset of YAML.
It would be nice to have support for YAML-style configuration files in the Util library. However, given the complexity of the YAML specification, only a minimal, reasonable subset of YAML will be implemented.
Specifically, only YAML constructs that can be mapped to the AbstractConfiguration data model will be supported. Details TBD.