Multiline evaluation issue and `e_v` missing

pohlan / SimpleSheet.jl

0 stars 0 forks source link

Closed luraess closed 3 years ago

luraess commented 3 years ago

Note that

as @pohlan reported, multiline statement are only evaluated if operator is at the end of previous line
e_v is missing in this version (i.e. implicitly set to 1) which makes the physics to run much faster (factor 1e3)

mauro3 commented 3 years ago

as @pohlan reported, multiline statement are only evaluated if operator is at the end of previous line

Yes, that one is annoying as no error gets thrown. In my defense, I copied that error from you, @luraess ;-)

mauro3 commented 3 years ago

I'll push a fix in a sec

luraess commented 3 years ago

I should have fixed the multiline issue in my owl-life. e_v showing up "explicitly" may be desired...