Closed andreyz closed 2 years ago
No reason, I don't think! I think we're relying on the synthesized memberwise initializer. If you'd like to PR an explicit, public one I don't see anything wrong with adding it! I could also see including the .noop
version in the PR.
It's been great to have
.failing
becoming available after recent modernisation, which naturally leads to implementing a.noop
version of the dependency too, but it isn't possible currently. Was there a reason for keepinginit
internal?