[Load Testing] fix: stress test duration calculation

bryanchriswhite commented 2 days ago

Summary

Fixes the test duration calculation for the relays stress test. This reduces (but does not seem to completely eliminate) the flakiness of the TheCorrectPairsCountOfClaimAndProofMessagesShouldBeCommittedOnchain assertion step.

Issue

Observation made while working on #643.

Type of change

Select one or more:

[ ] New feature, functionality or library
[x] Bug fix
[ ] Code health or cleanup
[ ] Documentation
[ ] Other (specify)

Testing

Documentation changes (only if making doc changes)

[ ] make docusaurus_start; only needed if you make doc changes

Local Testing (only if making code changes)

[ ] Unit Tests: make go_develop_and_test
[ ] LocalNet E2E Tests: make test_e2e
See quickstart guide for instructions

PR Testing (only if making code changes)

[ ] DevNet E2E Tests: Add the devnet-test-e2e label to the PR.
- THIS IS VERY EXPENSIVE, so only do it after all the reviews are complete.
- Optionally run make trigger_ci if you want to re-trigger tests without any code changes
- If tests fail, try re-running failed tests only using the GitHub UI as shown here

Sanity Checklist

[ ] I have tested my changes using the available tooling
[x] I have commented my code
[x] I have performed a self-review of my own code; both comments & source code
[ ] I create and reference any new tickets, if applicable
[ ] I have left TODOs throughout the codebase, if applicable

Summary by CodeRabbit

Refactor
- Improved the calculation method for total duration blocks in load testing, enhancing accuracy and consistency by leveraging shared parameters.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 2 days ago

Walkthrough

The update refactors the actorLoadTestIncrementPlans struct in the relays_stress_helpers_test.go file by modifying how total duration blocks are calculated. Instead of a direct calculation using sharedParams.GetGracePeriodEndOffsetBlocks() and sharedParams.GetNumBlocksPerSession(), the new implementation uses the shared.GetProofWindowCloseHeight function, streamlining and centralizing the calculation logic.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
`load-testing/tests/relays_stress_helpers_test.go`	Refactored calculation of total duration blocks in `actorLoadTestIncrementPlans` to use `shared.GetProofWindowCloseHeight`.
`.../poktroll/x/shared`	New import added for `shared` package utility.

Poem

In code's realm, a change does glide,
Refactor swift, in struct’s stride.
Total blocks now rightly shown,
Central logic brightly grown.
Shared path we now delight,
Proof's close height, clear and bright.
🌟🔧 A tweak so wise, the code’s new might! 🚀

[!TIP]

Early access features: enabled
We are currently testing the following features in early access: - **OpenAI `gpt-4o` model for code reviews and chat**: OpenAI claims that this model is better at understanding and generating code than the previous models. We seek your feedback over the next few weeks before making it generally available. Note: - You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file. - Please join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to provide feedback and report issues. - OSS projects are currently opted into early access features by default.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

bryanchriswhite commented 2 days ago

Closing. This is wrong and we implemented a better fix in @red-0ne's forthcoming PR branch.

pokt-network / poktroll