Open NoToothSon-Master opened 1 year ago
For example, take the who dataset:
who
#> # A tibble: 7,240 × 60
#> country iso2 iso3 year new_sp_…¹ new_s…² new_s…³ new_s…⁴ new_s…⁵
#> <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 Afghanistan AF AFG 1980 NA NA NA NA NA
#> 2 Afghanistan AF AFG 1981 NA NA NA NA NA
#> 3 Afghanistan AF AFG 1982 NA NA NA NA NA
#> 4 Afghanistan AF AFG 1983 NA NA NA NA NA
#> 5 Afghanistan AF AFG 1984 NA NA NA NA NA
#> 6 Afghanistan AF AFG 1985 NA NA NA NA NA
#> 7 Afghanistan AF AFG 1986 NA NA NA NA NA
#> 8 Afghanistan AF AFG 1987 NA NA NA NA NA
#> 9 Afghanistan AF AFG 1988 NA NA NA NA NA
#> 10 Afghanistan AF AFG 1989 NA NA NA NA NA
#> # … with 7,230 more rows, 51 more variables: new_sp_m5564 <dbl>,
#> # new_sp_m65 <dbl>, new_sp_f014 <dbl>, new_sp_f1524 <dbl>,
#> # new_sp_f2534 <dbl>, new_sp_f3544 <dbl>, new_sp_f4554 <dbl>,
#> # new_sp_f5564 <dbl>, new_sp_f65 <dbl>, new_sn_m014 <dbl>,
#> # new_sn_m1524 <dbl>, new_sn_m2534 <dbl>, new_sn_m3544 <dbl>,
#> # new_sn_m4554 <dbl>, new_sn_m5564 <dbl>, new_sn_m65 <dbl>,
#> # new_sn_f014 <dbl>, new_sn_f1524 <dbl>, new_sn_f2534 <dbl>, …
country
,iso2
, iso3
, and year
are already variables, so they can be left as is. But the columns from new_sp_m014
to newrel_f65
encode four variables in their names:
The new_/new
prefix indicates these are counts of new cases. This dataset only contains new cases, so we’ll ignore it here because it’s constant.
sp/rel/ep
describe how the case was diagnosed.
m/f
gives the gender.
014/1524/2535/3544/4554/65
supplies the age range.
We can break these variables up by specifying multiple column names in names_to
, and then either providing names_sep
or names_pattern
. Here names_pattern
is the most natural fit. It has a similar interface toextract
: you give it a regular expression containing groups (defined by ()) and it puts each group in a column.
who %>%
pivot_longer(
cols = new_sp_m014:newrel_f65,
names_to = c("diagnosis", "gender", "age"),
names_pattern = "new_?(.*)_(.)(.*)",
values_to = "count"
)
#> # A tibble: 405,440 × 8
#> country iso2 iso3 year diagnosis gender age count
#> <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl> <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl>
#> 1 Afghanistan AF AFG 1980 sp m 014 NA
#> 2 Afghanistan AF AFG 1980 sp m 1524 NA
#> 3 Afghanistan AF AFG 1980 sp m 2534 NA
#> 4 Afghanistan AF AFG 1980 sp m 3544 NA
#> 5 Afghanistan AF AFG 1980 sp m 4554 NA
#> 6 Afghanistan AF AFG 1980 sp m 5564 NA
#> 7 Afghanistan AF AFG 1980 sp m 65 NA
#> 8 Afghanistan AF AFG 1980 sp f 014 NA
#> 9 Afghanistan AF AFG 1980 sp f 1524 NA
#> 10 Afghanistan AF AFG 1980 sp f 2534 NA
#> # … with 405,430 more rows
Multiple observations per row
For example, take the household
dataset:
household
#> # A tibble: 5 × 5
#> family dob_child1 dob_child2 name_child1 name_child2
#> <int> <date> <date> <chr> <chr>
#> 1 1 1998-11-26 2000-01-29 Susan Jose
#> 2 2 1996-06-22 NA Mark NA
#> 3 3 2002-07-11 2004-04-05 Sam Seth
#> 4 4 2004-10-10 2009-08-27 Craig Khai
#> 5 5 2000-12-05 2005-02-28 Parker Gracie
Note that we have two pieces of information (or values) for each child: their name
and their dob
(date of birth). These need to go into separate columns in the result. Again we supply multiple variables to names_to
, using names_sep
to split up each variable name. Note the special name .value
: this tells pivot_longer()
that that part of the column name specifies the “value” being measured (which will become a variable in the output).
household %>%
pivot_longer(
cols = !family,
names_to = c(".value", "child"),
names_sep = "_",
values_drop_na = TRUE
)
#> # A tibble: 9 × 4
#> family child dob name
#> <int> <chr> <date> <chr>
#> 1 1 child1 1998-11-26 Susan
#> 2 1 child2 2000-01-29 Jose
#> 3 2 child1 1996-06-22 Mark
#> 4 3 child1 2002-07-11 Sam
#> 5 3 child2 2004-04-05 Seth
#> 6 4 child1 2004-10-10 Craig
#> 7 4 child2 2009-08-27 Khai
#> 8 5 child1 2000-12-05 Parker
#> 9 5 child2 2005-02-28 Gracie
Note the use of values_drop_na = TRUE
: the input shape forces the creation of explicit missing variables for observations that don’t exist.
For example, take the household dataset:
This one looks like a simple enough
Update: There is no .melt
+ .pivot
?.pivot
for lazyframes, alternative approach is a litte more involved.
household = b"""
family,dob_child1,dob_child2,name_child1,name_child2
1,1998-11-26,2000-01-29,Susan,Jose
2,1996-06-22,,Mark,
3,2002-07-11,2004-04-05,Sam,Seth
4,2004-10-10,2009-08-27,Craig,Khai
5,2000-12-05,2005-02-28,Parker,Gracie
"""
df = pl.read_csv(household.strip()).lazy()
names = (
pl.Series(df.select(pl.exclude("family")).columns)
.str.splitn(by="_", n=2)
.struct.rename_fields(["prefix", "suffix"])
.struct.unnest()
.select(pl.all().unique(maintain_order=True))
)
names = names.with_columns(pattern =
"^" + pl.col("prefix") + "_" + "(" + pl.col("suffix").str.concat("|") + ")" + "$"
)
columns = (
pl.concat_list(pl.col(row["pattern"])
.alias(row["prefix"]))
for row in names.to_dicts()
)
(
df.select(
"family",
pl.lit([names["suffix"]]).alias("suffix"),
*columns
)
.explode(pl.exclude("family"))
.collect()
)
# shape: (10, 4)
# ┌────────┬────────┬────────────┬────────┐
# │ family ┆ suffix ┆ dob ┆ name │
# │ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- │
# │ i64 ┆ str ┆ str ┆ str │
# ╞════════╪════════╪════════════╪════════╡
# │ 1 ┆ child1 ┆ 1998-11-26 ┆ Susan │
# │ 1 ┆ child2 ┆ 2000-01-29 ┆ Jose │
# │ 2 ┆ child1 ┆ 1996-06-22 ┆ Mark │
# │ 2 ┆ child2 ┆ null ┆ null │
# │ 3 ┆ child1 ┆ 2002-07-11 ┆ Sam │
# │ 3 ┆ child2 ┆ 2004-04-05 ┆ Seth │
# │ 4 ┆ child1 ┆ 2004-10-10 ┆ Craig │
# │ 4 ┆ child2 ┆ 2009-08-27 ┆ Khai │
# │ 5 ┆ child1 ┆ 2000-12-05 ┆ Parker │
# │ 5 ┆ child2 ┆ 2005-02-28 ┆ Gracie │
# └────────┴────────┴────────────┴────────┘
For example, take the who dataset:
I'm not sure I follow this one exactly, but it looks like this is a .melt
followed by a .join
to remap the names?
# https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/data
df = pl.read_csv("https://extranet.who.int/tme/generateCSV.asp?ds=notifications").lazy()
names = pl.DataFrame({
"variable": df.select(r"^new_?[^_]+_[mf]\d+$").columns
})
names = names.with_columns(
diagnosis = pl.col("variable").str.extract(r"^new_?([^_]+)"),
gender = pl.col("variable").str.extract(r"^new_?[^_]+_([mf])"),
age = pl.col("variable").str.extract(r"(\d+)$"),
)
id_vars = df.select(
pl.exclude(names.get_column("variable").to_list())
).columns
(df.melt(id_vars=id_vars, value_name="count")
.join(names.lazy(), on="variable")
.drop("variable")
.collect())
# shape: (713_760, 123)
# ┌─────────────┬──────┬──────┬─────────────┬───┬───────┬───────────┬────────┬─────┐
# │ country ┆ iso2 ┆ iso3 ┆ iso_numeric ┆ … ┆ count ┆ diagnosis ┆ gender ┆ age │
# │ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- │
# │ str ┆ str ┆ str ┆ i64 ┆ ┆ str ┆ str ┆ str ┆ str │
# ╞═════════════╪══════╪══════╪═════════════╪═══╪═══════╪═══════════╪════════╪═════╡
# │ Afghanistan ┆ AF ┆ AFG ┆ 4 ┆ … ┆ null ┆ sp ┆ m ┆ 04 │
# │ Afghanistan ┆ AF ┆ AFG ┆ 4 ┆ … ┆ null ┆ sp ┆ m ┆ 04 │
# │ Afghanistan ┆ AF ┆ AFG ┆ 4 ┆ … ┆ null ┆ sp ┆ m ┆ 04 │
# │ Afghanistan ┆ AF ┆ AFG ┆ 4 ┆ … ┆ null ┆ sp ┆ m ┆ 04 │
# │ … ┆ … ┆ … ┆ … ┆ … ┆ … ┆ … ┆ … ┆ … │
# │ Zimbabwe ┆ ZW ┆ ZWE ┆ 716 ┆ … ┆ 797 ┆ rel ┆ f ┆ 65 │
# │ Zimbabwe ┆ ZW ┆ ZWE ┆ 716 ┆ … ┆ 652 ┆ rel ┆ f ┆ 65 │
# │ Zimbabwe ┆ ZW ┆ ZWE ┆ 716 ┆ … ┆ 402 ┆ rel ┆ f ┆ 65 │
# │ Zimbabwe ┆ ZW ┆ ZWE ┆ 716 ┆ … ┆ 573 ┆ rel ┆ f ┆ 65 │
# └─────────────┴──────┴──────┴─────────────┴───┴───────┴───────────┴────────┴─────┘
Being able to extract multiple groups at once #7990 could clean up the .str.extract
part.
@cmdlineluser, at least in the R world the reason for these functions is that they allow for "efficient" and "fast" processing of such datasets in the calls to pivot
and melt
itself (see the data.table vignette here). In addition, they're also pretty intuitive once you understand the syntax.
Polars should get similar benefits if these operations are done in a single step without materializing all the other DataFrames that you needed to in the manipulation you've shown (even piping them causes materialization of the DataFrame, right?).
@avimallu Thanks for the feedback.
The household / .pivot()
example required a materialized dataframe - I did not realize that .pivot
does not exist in the Lazy API.
I changed both examples to use the lazy api - the household example is a little more complex now.
I guess the feature request is asking for .pivot_longer()
to be ported to polars though.
I implemented pivot_longer for pandas. Interested in doing the same for polars. Any tips/guide on where/how I should go about it? Is there an interest in implementing this?
@samukweku I'm not in a position to say whether or not the core team that merges PRs would want that feature in general. However, I do know that there's a strong aversion to having features in only python so I do think they'd only consider it if it were written in rust. I'm not sure if that's what your intention would have been with that respect.
@deanm0000 I did not dwell on it since it did no seem like there was much interest in it. Yes, implementation would have to be in rust, which is the right approach. Besides, I feel with the current tools in Polars, it is possible to replicate pivot_longer
in a generic form. Thanks for the feedback though - much appreciated.
pyjanitor has a polars' variant for pivot_longer, as well as pivot_longer_spec which replicates tidyr's pivot_longer, and is efficient as well.
examples based on data shared above on this issue:
import polars as pl
import janitor.polars
household = b"""
family,dob_child1,dob_child2,name_child1,name_child2
1,1998-11-26,2000-01-29,Susan,Jose
2,1996-06-22,,Mark,
3,2002-07-11,2004-04-05,Sam,Seth
4,2004-10-10,2009-08-27,Craig,Khai
5,2000-12-05,2005-02-28,Parker,Gracie
"""
df = pl.read_csv(household.strip())
df
shape: (5, 5)
┌────────┬────────────┬────────────┬─────────────┬─────────────┐
│ family ┆ dob_child1 ┆ dob_child2 ┆ name_child1 ┆ name_child2 │
│ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- │
│ i64 ┆ str ┆ str ┆ str ┆ str │
╞════════╪════════════╪════════════╪═════════════╪═════════════╡
│ 1 ┆ 1998-11-26 ┆ 2000-01-29 ┆ Susan ┆ Jose │
│ 2 ┆ 1996-06-22 ┆ null ┆ Mark ┆ null │
│ 3 ┆ 2002-07-11 ┆ 2004-04-05 ┆ Sam ┆ Seth │
│ 4 ┆ 2004-10-10 ┆ 2009-08-27 ┆ Craig ┆ Khai │
│ 5 ┆ 2000-12-05 ┆ 2005-02-28 ┆ Parker ┆ Gracie │
└────────┴────────────┴────────────┴─────────────┴─────────────┘
df.pivot_longer(index='family', names_to = ('.value','child'), names_sep='_')
shape: (10, 4)
┌────────┬────────┬────────────┬────────┐
│ family ┆ child ┆ dob ┆ name │
│ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- │
│ i64 ┆ str ┆ str ┆ str │
╞════════╪════════╪════════════╪════════╡
│ 1 ┆ child1 ┆ 1998-11-26 ┆ Susan │
│ 2 ┆ child1 ┆ 1996-06-22 ┆ Mark │
│ 3 ┆ child1 ┆ 2002-07-11 ┆ Sam │
│ 4 ┆ child1 ┆ 2004-10-10 ┆ Craig │
│ 5 ┆ child1 ┆ 2000-12-05 ┆ Parker │
│ 1 ┆ child2 ┆ 2000-01-29 ┆ Jose │
│ 2 ┆ child2 ┆ null ┆ null │
│ 3 ┆ child2 ┆ 2004-04-05 ┆ Seth │
│ 4 ┆ child2 ┆ 2009-08-27 ┆ Khai │
│ 5 ┆ child2 ┆ 2005-02-28 ┆ Gracie │
└────────┴────────┴────────────┴────────┘
who_url='https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tidyverse/tidyr/main/data-raw/who.csv'
df=pl.read_csv(who_url)
df.head()
shape: (5, 60)
┌─────────────┬──────┬──────┬──────┬───┬──────────────┬──────────────┬──────────────┬────────────┐
│ country ┆ iso2 ┆ iso3 ┆ year ┆ … ┆ newrel_f3544 ┆ newrel_f4554 ┆ newrel_f5564 ┆ newrel_f65 │
│ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- │
│ str ┆ str ┆ str ┆ i64 ┆ ┆ str ┆ str ┆ str ┆ str │
╞═════════════╪══════╪══════╪══════╪═══╪══════════════╪══════════════╪══════════════╪════════════╡
│ Afghanistan ┆ AF ┆ AFG ┆ 1980 ┆ … ┆ NA ┆ NA ┆ NA ┆ NA │
│ Afghanistan ┆ AF ┆ AFG ┆ 1981 ┆ … ┆ NA ┆ NA ┆ NA ┆ NA │
│ Afghanistan ┆ AF ┆ AFG ┆ 1982 ┆ … ┆ NA ┆ NA ┆ NA ┆ NA │
│ Afghanistan ┆ AF ┆ AFG ┆ 1983 ┆ … ┆ NA ┆ NA ┆ NA ┆ NA │
│ Afghanistan ┆ AF ┆ AFG ┆ 1984 ┆ … ┆ NA ┆ NA ┆ NA ┆ NA │
└─────────────┴──────┴──────┴──────┴───┴──────────────┴──────────────┴──────────────┴────────────┘
In [53]: (df.pivot_longer(
...: index=['country','iso2','iso3','year'],
...: names_to = ('diagnosis','gender','age'),
...: names_pattern = r"new_?(.+)_(.)([0-9]+)",
...: values_to='count')
...: )
Out[53]:
shape: (405_440, 8)
┌─────────────┬──────┬──────┬──────┬───────────┬────────┬─────┬───────┐
│ country ┆ iso2 ┆ iso3 ┆ year ┆ diagnosis ┆ gender ┆ age ┆ count │
│ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- │
│ str ┆ str ┆ str ┆ i64 ┆ str ┆ str ┆ str ┆ str │
╞═════════════╪══════╪══════╪══════╪═══════════╪════════╪═════╪═══════╡
│ Afghanistan ┆ AF ┆ AFG ┆ 1980 ┆ sp ┆ m ┆ 014 ┆ NA │
│ Afghanistan ┆ AF ┆ AFG ┆ 1981 ┆ sp ┆ m ┆ 014 ┆ NA │
│ Afghanistan ┆ AF ┆ AFG ┆ 1982 ┆ sp ┆ m ┆ 014 ┆ NA │
│ Afghanistan ┆ AF ┆ AFG ┆ 1983 ┆ sp ┆ m ┆ 014 ┆ NA │
│ Afghanistan ┆ AF ┆ AFG ┆ 1984 ┆ sp ┆ m ┆ 014 ┆ NA │
│ … ┆ … ┆ … ┆ … ┆ … ┆ … ┆ … ┆ … │
│ Zimbabwe ┆ ZW ┆ ZWE ┆ 2009 ┆ rel ┆ f ┆ 65 ┆ NA │
│ Zimbabwe ┆ ZW ┆ ZWE ┆ 2010 ┆ rel ┆ f ┆ 65 ┆ NA │
│ Zimbabwe ┆ ZW ┆ ZWE ┆ 2011 ┆ rel ┆ f ┆ 65 ┆ NA │
│ Zimbabwe ┆ ZW ┆ ZWE ┆ 2012 ┆ rel ┆ f ┆ 65 ┆ NA │
│ Zimbabwe ┆ ZW ┆ ZWE ┆ 2013 ┆ rel ┆ f ┆ 65 ┆ 725 │
└─────────────┴──────┴──────┴──────┴───────────┴────────┴─────┴───────┘
You also have more control by passing a specification to pivot_longer_spec
:
# https://stackoverflow.com/q/61367186/7175713
from janitor.polars import pivot_longer_spec
data={'group': [1.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 3.0],
'BP': [0.51, 0.67, 0.36, 0.09, 0.68, 0.53],
'HS': [0.15, 0.09, 0.13, 0.17, 0.12, 0.15],
'BB': [0.05, 0.06, 0.07, 0.09, 0.07, 0.06],
'lowerBP': [0.16, 0.09, 0.12, 0.13, 0.12, 0.14],
'upperBP': [0.18, 0.11, 0.15, 0.16, 0.14, 0.16],
'lowerHS': [0.5, 0.66, 0.34, 0.08, 0.66, 0.52],
'upperHS': [0.52, 0.68, 0.38, 0.11, 0.69, 0.53],
'lowerBB': [0.14, 0.08, 0.12, 0.15, 0.11, 0.15],
'upperBB': [0.16, 0.1, 0.14, 0.18, 0.13, 0.16]}
df = pl.DataFrame(data)
df
shape: (6, 10)
┌───────┬──────┬──────┬──────┬───┬─────────┬─────────┬─────────┬─────────┐
│ group ┆ BP ┆ HS ┆ BB ┆ … ┆ lowerHS ┆ upperHS ┆ lowerBB ┆ upperBB │
│ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- │
│ f64 ┆ f64 ┆ f64 ┆ f64 ┆ ┆ f64 ┆ f64 ┆ f64 ┆ f64 │
╞═══════╪══════╪══════╪══════╪═══╪═════════╪═════════╪═════════╪═════════╡
│ 1.0 ┆ 0.51 ┆ 0.15 ┆ 0.05 ┆ … ┆ 0.5 ┆ 0.52 ┆ 0.14 ┆ 0.16 │
│ 2.1 ┆ 0.67 ┆ 0.09 ┆ 0.06 ┆ … ┆ 0.66 ┆ 0.68 ┆ 0.08 ┆ 0.1 │
│ 2.2 ┆ 0.36 ┆ 0.13 ┆ 0.07 ┆ … ┆ 0.34 ┆ 0.38 ┆ 0.12 ┆ 0.14 │
│ 2.3 ┆ 0.09 ┆ 0.17 ┆ 0.09 ┆ … ┆ 0.08 ┆ 0.11 ┆ 0.15 ┆ 0.18 │
│ 2.4 ┆ 0.68 ┆ 0.12 ┆ 0.07 ┆ … ┆ 0.66 ┆ 0.69 ┆ 0.11 ┆ 0.13 │
│ 3.0 ┆ 0.53 ┆ 0.15 ┆ 0.06 ┆ … ┆ 0.52 ┆ 0.53 ┆ 0.15 ┆ 0.16 │
└───────┴──────┴──────┴──────┴───┴─────────┴─────────┴─────────┴─────────┘
spec = {'.name':df.columns[1:],
'.value':['values','values','values','lower','upper','lower','upper','lower','upper'],
'names':['BP','HS','BB','BP','BP','HS','HS','BB','BB']}
spec = pl.DataFrame(spec)
spec
shape: (9, 3)
┌─────────┬────────┬───────┐
│ .name ┆ .value ┆ names │
│ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- │
│ str ┆ str ┆ str │
╞═════════╪════════╪═══════╡
│ BP ┆ values ┆ BP │
│ HS ┆ values ┆ HS │
│ BB ┆ values ┆ BB │
│ lowerBP ┆ lower ┆ BP │
│ upperBP ┆ upper ┆ BP │
│ lowerHS ┆ lower ┆ HS │
│ upperHS ┆ upper ┆ HS │
│ lowerBB ┆ lower ┆ BB │
│ upperBB ┆ upper ┆ BB │
└─────────┴────────┴───────┘
pivot_longer_spec(df=df,spec=spec)
shape: (18, 5)
┌───────┬───────┬────────┬───────┬───────┐
│ group ┆ names ┆ values ┆ lower ┆ upper │
│ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- │
│ f64 ┆ str ┆ f64 ┆ f64 ┆ f64 │
╞═══════╪═══════╪════════╪═══════╪═══════╡
│ 1.0 ┆ HS ┆ 0.15 ┆ 0.5 ┆ 0.52 │
│ 2.1 ┆ HS ┆ 0.09 ┆ 0.66 ┆ 0.68 │
│ 2.2 ┆ HS ┆ 0.13 ┆ 0.34 ┆ 0.38 │
│ 2.3 ┆ HS ┆ 0.17 ┆ 0.08 ┆ 0.11 │
│ 2.4 ┆ HS ┆ 0.12 ┆ 0.66 ┆ 0.69 │
│ … ┆ … ┆ … ┆ … ┆ … │
│ 2.1 ┆ BB ┆ 0.06 ┆ 0.08 ┆ 0.1 │
│ 2.2 ┆ BB ┆ 0.07 ┆ 0.12 ┆ 0.14 │
│ 2.3 ┆ BB ┆ 0.09 ┆ 0.15 ┆ 0.18 │
│ 2.4 ┆ BB ┆ 0.07 ┆ 0.11 ┆ 0.13 │
│ 3.0 ┆ BB ┆ 0.06 ┆ 0.15 ┆ 0.16 │
└───────┴───────┴────────┴───────┴───────┘
Problem description
Compared to R's tidyverse, polars doesn't do a very good job of reshaping the data.polars'
pivot()
andmelt()
can only do the simplest data reshaping, while R'spivot_longer()
andpivot_wider ()
can solve various data reshaping problems in data science.