Support for both Brightway 2 and 2.5

[cmutel]

🔨 Work in progress 🔨

Factors out Brightway functionality, and imports the correct function depending on which version is installed.

• To install the 2.5 version via pip: pip install premise[bw25].
• On conda we might be able to do the same variant, or just create two different packages.

To support this, I moved from setup.py to pyproject.toml. This also gives us:

• The new standard packaging pipeline
• Automatic building of wheels (run python -m build)
• One place to define the version: __init__.py
• One place to define the requirements: requirements.txt
• Inclusion of pytest and other config data (pytest.ini is removed)

Note that 2.5 support requires bw2data 4.0.DEV32, which isn't yet released (will be in ~1 hour from this comment).

We need some testing before this should be released. I have tested the 2.5 functionality, and it builds a matrix and gives a sensible result. However, it would be nice to have a known good result, and test both BW2 and BW2.5 scores. @romainsacchi Could you give a known good result please?

TODO

• [x] Add notification for bw2data version imported, and bw2/2.5
• [x] Test export to normal DB on BW2
• [x] Test export to normal DB on BW2.5
• [ ] Check packaging still works on CI

[cmutel]

There also might be some packaging weirdness, it seems to work for me now but pyproject.toml is a harsh mistress...

[cmutel]

Also, I don't know anything about how write_superstructure_db_to_brightway works, this might be broken? Not sure why it would be but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[tngTUDOR]

🔨 Work in progress 🔨

Factors out Brightway functionality, and imports the correct function depending on which version is installed.

* To install the 2.5 version via pip: `pip install premise[bw25]`.

* On `conda` we might be able to do the same variant, or just create two different packages.

By experience, it's "easier" to produce a different conda package (see the ui package building )

[tngTUDOR]

There also might be some packaging weirdness, it seems to work for me now but pyproject.toml is a harsh mistress...

main branch has some fixes for the github actions to work fine now for packaging pypi pkgs and upload them to the registry.

[romainsacchi]

@cmutel the folowing

from premise import *
from datapackage import Package
bw.projects.set_current("ei39")

scenarios = [
    {"model": "image", "pathway":"SSP2-Base", "year": 2050},
    {"model": "remind", "pathway":"SSP2-PkBudg500", "year": 2050},
]

ndb = NewDatabase(
        scenarios = scenarios,        
        source_db="ecoinvent 3.9.1 cutoff",
        source_version="3.9",
        key='tUePmX_S5B8ieZkkM7WUU2CnO8SmShwmAeWK9x2rTFo=',
)
ndb.update_all()
ndb.write_db_to_brightway()

FU = [
    {act: 1} for db in [
        "ecoinvent 3.9.1 cutoff",
        "ecoinvent_cutoff_3.9_image_SSP2-Base_2050",
        "ecoinvent_cutoff_3.9_remind_SSP2-PkBudg500_2050"
    ] for act in bw2data.Database(db) 
    if act["name"]=="transport, passenger car, electric"
    and act["location"] == "GLO"
]

method = [('IPCC 2021', 'climate change: fossil', 'global warming potential (GWP100)')]

bw2calc.multi_lca.calculation_setups["BEVs"] = {
    "inv": FU,
    "ia": method
}

lca = bw2calc.MultiLCA("BEVs")

print(lca.results)

should return:

[[0.22982712]
 [0.20379977]
 [0.03638609]]

[romainsacchi]

Also, I don't know anything about how write_superstructure_db_to_brightway works, this might be broken? Not sure why it would be but ¯_(ツ)_/¯

.write_superstructure_db_to_brightway eventually writes a regular database. So if .write_db_to_brightway works, that should work too.

[cmutel]

2.5 Scores look good:

0.22973739152327347 0.22982712
0.20376602910863864 0.20379977
0.0363075968642278 0.03638609

[cmutel]

Brightway 2 results are also good!

0.2298271180989315 0.22982712 
0.2038174193431219 0.20379977 
0.03630759719576193 0.03638609

[cmutel]

@romainsacchi I think this is ready to merge. We can push a release like 1.8.0.dev1 and see if it build correctly.