Closed rb643 closed 2 years ago
that would be cool - but I don't have time to work on it for the foreseeable future, but if anyone was interested in having a shot at it I'd be happy to help out!
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 6:50 AM Richard notifications@github.com wrote:
Maybe a suggestion for future add-ons: would it be possible to export this to the various biosketch formats used by NIH or other government/funding agencies?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/poldrack/autoCV/issues/10, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGUVEAQEFKIX6A6Q2ZMKQDR773J3ANCNFSM4PZ7KLCQ .
-- Russell A. Poldrack Albert Ray Lang Professor of Psychology Building 420 Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305
poldrack@stanford.edu http://www.poldracklab.org/
This is somewhat addressed with sciENcv, which is being used by both NIH and NSF by pulling data from ORCID.
heavy on the "somewhat" :-) but I think that at least for NSF bios sciencv is probably the only game in town since they seem to do PDF validation and I would not want to be in the game of trying to keep up with government PDF validation rules...
heavy on the "somewhat" :-) but I think that at least for NSF bios sciencv is probably the only game in town since they seem to do PDF validation and I would not want to be in the game of trying to keep up with government PDF validation rules...
I never said you should. I'm merely pointing out the policy change to require sciENcv for those proposals. Essentially you could close this issue given the OP was for NIH, etc. New policies (NSPM-33) is likely going to result in sciENcv being adopted for other agencies if a biosketch is needed.
got it, thanks! Closing.
Maybe a suggestion for future add-ons: would it be possible to export this to the various biosketch formats used by NIH or other government/funding agencies?