There are two instances of "probabilistic classification task" in cognitive atlas - one describes a "feedback" contrast and the other is more specific to describe a "positive feedback" and "negative feedback" contrast. I think we need to look over these two in the context of the group, because some assertions are not logical. For example, the first makes the assertion that visual form recognition is measured by both positive and negative feedback, and the second does not make any assertion between visual form recognition and feedback (but the assertion is made for visual word recognition, and positive/negative feedback also have this assertion). It could be the case that the two instantiations of the task are different, but we should double check this.
If it is incorrect, we should either be more specific for the first task (i.e., add positive/negative) or add the missing contrast (i.e., assertion that visual form recognition --> feedback)
There are two instances of "probabilistic classification task" in cognitive atlas - one describes a "feedback" contrast and the other is more specific to describe a "positive feedback" and "negative feedback" contrast. I think we need to look over these two in the context of the group, because some assertions are not logical. For example, the first makes the assertion that visual form recognition is measured by both positive and negative feedback, and the second does not make any assertion between visual form recognition and feedback (but the assertion is made for visual word recognition, and positive/negative feedback also have this assertion). It could be the case that the two instantiations of the task are different, but we should double check this.
If it is incorrect, we should either be more specific for the first task (i.e., add positive/negative) or add the missing contrast (i.e., assertion that visual form recognition --> feedback)