Fix IPFS deployer subdirectory duplication issue

[pileks]

This PR aims to:

• Fix the IPFS deployer subdirectory issue described in #1846
• Lightly refactor the IPFS deployer to allow unit tests to be written for this case

[krisbitney]

@CodiumAI-Agent /review

[CodiumAI-Agent]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: Fixing a bug in the IPFS deployer and refactoring the code to make it testable

• 📌 Type of PR: Bug fix

• 🧪 Relevant tests added: Yes

• ✨ Focused PR: Yes, because all changes are related to the IPFS deployer bug fix and refactoring

• 🔒 Security concerns: No, because the changes in this PR do not introduce any new security concerns.

  PR Feedback

• General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and focused on a specific issue. The refactor makes the code more modular and testable, which is a good practice. However, consider using path.join() for constructing paths to avoid potential issues with different operating systems.

• 🤖 Code feedback:

  • relevant file: packages/cli/src/lib/defaults/deploy-modules/ipfs/utils.ts suggestion: Consider using path.join() for constructing paths. This can help avoid potential issues with different operating systems and make the code more robust. [important] relevant line: ${path}/${dirent.name}

  • relevant file: packages/cli/src/lib/defaults/deploy-modules/ipfs/utils.ts suggestion: Consider handling potential errors that might occur during the reading of the directory or file. This can be done using try/catch blocks. [important] relevant line: const dirents: fs.Dirent[] = await fs.promises.readdir(path, { withFileTypes: true });

  • relevant file: packages/cli/src/lib/defaults/deploy-modules/ipfs/utils.ts suggestion: Consider using a more descriptive name for the variable 'dirents'. It might be more clear to name it something like 'directoryEntries'. [medium] relevant line: const dirents: fs.Dirent[] = await fs.promises.readdir(path, { withFileTypes: true });

How to use

Tag me in a comment '@CodiumAI-Agent' and add one of the following commands: /review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option. /describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. /ask \<QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.

To edit any configuration parameter from 'configuration.toml', add --config_path=new_value For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..." To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.