make all evidence code description visible via mouse over

[pombase-admin]

a la "ontology definitions"

Original comment by: ValWood

[pombase-admin]

I think we should do this for all the evidence codes. "IDA" and the rest are not super obvious.

Original comment by: kimrutherford

[pombase-admin]

Absolutly (although we do spell those ot as Iferred from) we could use the full defs from the ECO equivalent

Original comment by: ValWood

[kimrutherford]

make all evidence code description visible via mouse over

Is this referring to the annotation tables?

[ValWood]

Its when making the annotation, when using the pull down menu. We should show the defs (from ECO) in the same way that we show the defs of ontology terms.

[ValWood]

[ValWood]

so here....

[kimrutherford]

Its when making the annotation, when using the pull down menu. We should show the defs (from ECO) in the same way that we show the defs of ontology terms.

OK, thanks.

Unfortunately due to the way browsers implement these pull downs it's not possible to have it looking as nice as for the term completion, but we can do something basic quickly.

Where can I get some nice, brief descriptions of the evidence codes for GO? Should I just use the first sentence on pages like this?: http://geneontology.org/page/ida-inferred-direct-assay

Are these definitions OK for interaction evidence codes?: http://wiki.thebiogrid.org/doku.php/experimental_systems

[ValWood]

I think that all of the GO evidence codes are mapped to ECO, if this is the case we should be able to use the ECO descriptions for GO & FYPO?

[kimrutherford]

OK, thanks. I found the mapping: https://evidenceontology.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/gaf-eco-mapping.txt

[kimrutherford]

I've got the definitions now but they aren't very friendly. Should I use these for now?:

EXP A type of experimental evidence that is used in a manual assertion.
IBA A type of biological aspect of ancestor evidence that is used in a manual assertion.
IBD A type of biological aspect of descendant evidence that is used in a manual assertion.
IC A type of curator inference that is used in a manual assertion.
IDA A type of direct assay evidence that is used in a manual assertion.
IEA A type of evidence that is used in an automatic assertion.
IEP A type of expression pattern evidence that is used in a manual assertion.
IGC A type of genomic context evidence that is used in a manual assertion.
IGI A type of genetic interaction experiment evidence that is used in a manual assertion.
IKR A type of phylogenetic determination of loss of key residues evidence that is used in a manual assertion.
IMP A type of mutant phenotype evidence that is used in a manual assertion.
IMR A type of phylogenetic determination of loss of key residues evidence that is used in a manual assertion.
IPI A type of physical interaction evidence that is used in a manual assertion.
IRD A type of rapid divergence from ancestral sequence evidence that is used in a manual assertion.
ISA Sequence alignment evidence that is used in a manual assertion.
ISM A match to sequence model evidence that is employed in a manual assertion.
ISO Sequence orthology evidence that is employed in a manual assertion.
ISS Sequence similarity evidence that is used in a manual assertion.
NAS A type of non-traceable author statement that is used in a manual assertion.
ND A type of no biological data found that is used in a manual assertion.
RCA A type of computational combinatorial analysis that is used in a manual assertion.
TAS A type of traceable author statement that is used in a manual assertion.

[ValWood]

Oh. Maybe we should only do this for biogrid codes then!

[kimrutherford]

Will these ones do?: http://wiki.thebiogrid.org/doku.php/experimental_systems

[kimrutherford]

The best I can do at the moment is this:

The description appears if you hover the mouse over an evidence code for a second.

[ValWood]

perfect, thanks

Val