pombase / curation

PomBase curation
7 stars 0 forks source link

some annotations that were there 4 years ago that might be valid #1870

Closed ValWood closed 5 years ago

ValWood commented 6 years ago

Various reasons they could have disappeared, I nearly finished checking and most things that have disappeared were bad.

These might be OK:

nucleobase-containing small molecule metabolic process consider

ValWood commented 6 years ago

carbohydrate

ValWood commented 6 years ago

transmembrane transport

ValWood commented 6 years ago

cytoskeleton (actin)

ValWood commented 6 years ago

DNA repair?

ValWood commented 6 years ago

conjugation @Antonialock

Antonialock commented 6 years ago

ohh, yes, all of these should be negative regulation of conjugation with cellular fusion I guess

(pka1 phosphorylates rst2 resulting in rst2 exclusion from the nucleus. rst2 when in the nucleus acts as a TF fror ste11 which drives mating

Antonialock commented 6 years ago

all genes annotated to "adenylate cyclase-activating glucose-activated G-protein coupled receptor signaling pathway" now also have the annotation negative regulation of induction of conjugation with cellular fusion.

ValWood commented 6 years ago
ValWood commented 6 years ago

meiotic nuclear division

NMS complex

Systematic ID

/GO="aspect=P; term=attachment of spindle microtubules to kinetochore involved in homologous chromosome segregation; GOid=GO:0051455; evidence=IC; db_xref=GO_REF:0000111; from=GO:0031617; date=20180307"

ValWood commented 6 years ago

cell cycle transition

APC can have /GO="aspect=P; term=positive regulation of mitotic metaphase/anaphase transition; GOid=GO:0045842; evidence=IC; db_xref=GO_REF:0000111; from=GO:0005680; date=20180307"

ValWood commented 6 years ago

cytokinesis

ValWood commented 6 years ago

carbohydrate derivative

ValWood commented 6 years ago

I've done most of these.

When you get chance @mah11 could you check the "DNA repair complexes, will need to be done by ISS or IC if evidence at SGD is good enough that there are part of repair.

@Antonialock can you see if there is an easy/quick way to get "meiotic nuclear division" onto those where it is valid?

mah11 commented 6 years ago

progress so far:

Should I look into individual Ino80 complex subunits in more detail (post-hols)?

ValWood commented 6 years ago

No leave it at that ...just wanted to make sure we were missing nothing obvious....

mah11 commented 6 years ago

OK. I like that answer ;)

ValWood commented 5 years ago

The only outstanding part of this ticket is to try to annotate these to meiotic nuclear division (or regulation of) in some way

Antonialock commented 5 years ago

cdc2 done, doing 25688135 for sad1

Antonialock commented 5 years ago

I don't think spo15 should have meiotic nuclear division....it's a sporulation protein, meiosis I and II are normal. It's involved in spindle pole body remodelling. This maps to sexual reproduction / meiotic cell cycle process

Antonialock commented 5 years ago

same with cam1

ValWood commented 5 years ago

OK makes sense. The SPB remodelling occurs quite far upstream of events of division (prophase?)

Antonialock commented 5 years ago

no it's when it remodels to form a crescent during sporulation

ValWood commented 5 years ago

Ah OK yes even further upstream...