pombase / curation

PomBase curation
7 stars 0 forks source link

plan for ncRNAs #2007

Closed Antonialock closed 4 years ago

Antonialock commented 6 years ago

We have a lot of ncRNAs in the features file and we are about to get more from Jurg.

Some are 'known' (tRNAs, snoRNAs, lncRNAs with a demonstrated regulatory function etc), some are unknown (could have a function or could be transcriptional noise?)

what to do?

I am guessing we want to keep anything with a demonstrated function in the features file?

For uncharacterised ncRNAs:

  1. break out all unknown ncRNAs into one separate track?
  2. break out all unknown ncRNAs into study specific tracks?

anything else to think of?

ValWood commented 6 years ago
ValWood commented 6 years ago

@bahler

Hi Jurg, welcome to the PomBAse GitHub tracker. You can reply to the ticket and it will be posted in the tracker. Where is your new ncRNA data?

bahler commented 6 years ago

Danny is working on providing you all the data required for browser (bigwig etc. etc.). But it is not that straightforward and he is very busy.

Cheers, -Jürg

bahler commented 6 years ago

Danny is working on providing you all the data required

ValWood commented 6 years ago

OK we are not in a hurry.... Cheers

Val

On 20/07/2018 17:45, bahler wrote:

Danny is working on providing you all the data required for browser (bigwig etc. etc.). But it is not that straightforward and he is very busy.

Cheers, -Jürg

From: Val Wood [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: 20 July 2018 17:41 To: pombase/curation curation@noreply.github.com Cc: Bahler, Jurg j.bahler@ucl.ac.uk; Mention mention@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [pombase/curation] ncRNAs (#2007)

@bahlerhttps://github.com/bahler

Hi Jurg, welcome to the PomBAse GitHub tracker. You can reply to the ticket and it will be posted in the tracker. Where is your new ncRNA data?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/pombase/curation/issues/2007#issuecomment-406656953, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANk7VAHlbwHCCcIP7FbJhPS5yidIVhJgks5uIggBgaJpZM4UM-mk.

— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/pombase/curation/issues/2007#issuecomment-406658266, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHBLKDhDDGQ7HsnRNYVjVa8OEANXwUC2ks5uIgkUgaJpZM4UM-mk.

-- University of Cambridge PomBase http://www.pombase.org/ Cambridge Systems Biology Centre http://www.sysbiol.cam.ac.uk/Investigators/val-wood

Antonialock commented 5 years ago

The paper for the ncRNAs with new PomBase systematic IDs is PMID:29914874

ValWood commented 4 years ago

@bahler did you want to move forwards hosting the RNAs?This ticket seems to be stalled waiting for data?

bahler commented 4 years ago

Yes please, will ask Maria to send you gff files. We had decided a while ago to remove all SPNCRNA genes from PomBase, except those which have evidence for function (we are finalizing a paper with phenotypes for many ncRNA mutants). PomBase shows still unbalanced information regarding ncRNAs, in that the old ncRNAS (up to about SPNCRNA15500 are presented, but the more numerous (and often more reliable) new ones (SPNCRNA.2000 to SPNCRNA.7774) are not shown. As discussed, it may be best to only show these in a browser (except for those with functional evidence, we will publish some soon), but this is true also for old ones that are often cryptic and should be removed from PomBase unless there is evidence for function.

ValWood commented 4 years ago

Yes I am a bit confused about what was decided, which ones to remove, whether any are redundant or need merging, what to do with other peoples datasets etc.

I think the best think is first to get all the data hosted as tracks and then evaluate the situation...

I can deal with the UTrs at the same time.

ValWood commented 4 years ago

I will open a new ticket for this issue. I want to keep this thread as an archive but I'll list all of the datasets and questions in a new ticket.

ValWood commented 4 years ago

please refer to the new ticket https://github.com/pombase/curation/issues/2809